OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Genetics journal rankings 2016

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Genetics has 20 ranked journals in 2016. The median journal has an OJR of 0.55, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2015; Q1 starts at OJR 1.02. The top three are Neuro-Oncology, Brain Pathology, and Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

20
<1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.55+0.03 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

40%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,055
Median positive listed APC: $4,055 among 10 journals. 10 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Genetics ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Neuro-OncologyOxford University Press · United States
2.62Q16.76 0.78 down from 201569486%$5,132
2Brain PathologyOAWiley · United Kingdom
1.90Q14.68 0.48 up from 201527194%$4,080
3Journal of Neuro-OncologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.22Q13.24 0.09 down from 201596428%$4,590
4ISRN HematologyOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
1.03Q13.36 1.53 up from 201530——
5Advances in HematologyOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
1.02Q12.43 0.17 down from 201560100%$860
6Current Stem Cell Research & TherapyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.99Q22.23 0.55 down from 201518810%—
7Blood Cells Molecules and DiseasesElsevier BV · United States
0.83Q21.95 0.44 down from 201531124%$4,030
0.72Q21.69 0.37 up from 201583100%—
9Brain Tumor PathologySpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.69Q22.06 0.25 up from 201510418%$4,290
10Neuro-Oncology PracticeOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.59Q21.48 0.41 up from 201582100%$5,036
11CNS OncologyOAFuture Medicine · United Kingdom
0.52Q31.25 0.28 up from 2015148100%$1,415
12Clinical NeuropathologyDustri-Verlag · Germany
0.47Q31.09 0.08 down from 201518113%—
13Pediatric NeurosurgeryKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.39Q30.82 0.18 up from 20151565%—
14Blood and Lymphatic Cancer Targets and TherapyOADove Medical Press · New Zealand
0.36Q30.96 0.67 up from 201530100%$2,320
15HemoglobinTaylor & Francis · United States
0.26Q30.88 0.07 down from 20152686%—
16Stem Cell DiscoveryOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.22Q40.95 0.55 up from 201551100%—
0.18Q40.31 0.13 up from 201539100%—
18Annales de biologie cliniqueJohn Libbey Eurotext · France
0.14Q40.17 0.07 down from 20154261%—
19Thalassemia ReportsOAPAGEPress (Italy) · Switzerland
0.09Q40.22 0.03 up from 201575100%$1,207
20Journal of Nephrology & TherapeuticsOMICS Publishing Group
0.07Q40.21no change28318%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

15 additional Genetics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
30,424 +20.2% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.555 +48.7% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals888888910111111121417191920212024222020221919
Window papers (baseline)8,1748,9149,2919,95110,61811,88213,43715,22516,95719,31222,10124,01825,12525,31527,08328,64230,42431,37032,56033,62435,24837,12239,04439,48539,13139,396
Median OJR0.440.500.5530.6230.730.790.5400.390.450.760.740.7070.630.370.330.5260.5550.6190.7100.470.6780.670.600.5370.5310.680

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.