OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journal rankings 2001

46 ranked journals · Subfield in Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology has 46 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR fell 0.09 on 2000 to 0.77, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.42. The top three are Evolution and Human Behavior, Contemporary Educational Psychology, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

46
8% of Psychology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.77-0.09 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

7%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,640
Median positive listed APC: $3,640 among 29 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 16 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Psychology (7)

46 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Evolution and Human BehaviorElsevier BV · United States
3.75Q12.96 0.63 up from 2000943%$4,330
2Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.51Q11.85 0.61 up from 2000800%$4,720
2.40Q12.19 0.38 up from 20001539%$3,530
4Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
2.24Q11.70 0.25 down from 20001662%—
2.11Q11.35 0.30 up from 200011613%$3,760
6Philosophia MathematicaOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.10Q10.41 0.28 up from 2000750%$4,533
7Human NatureSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.99Q11.57 0.30 down from 2000506%$2,190
8Multivariate Behavioral ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
1.89Q10.66 0.76 down from 20006412%—
9SLEEPOxford University Press · United States
1.80Q13.07 0.04 down from 200016419%$4,388
10Cognitive Therapy and ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.62Q11.42 0.52 up from 20001374%$4,090
11PhonologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.47Q11.88 0.39 up from 20004514%$3,550
12Gifted Child QuarterlySAGE Publishing · United States
1.42Q10.98 0.40 down from 2000650%$1,400
13Journal of PhoneticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.35Q21.35 0.20 down from 2000575%$3,210
14Sleep MedicineElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.33Q22.24no 2000 value331%$4,350—
15Language and SpeechSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.29Q20.38 0.94 down from 20006017%$3,650
16Journal of Sleep ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.25Q22.30 0.27 up from 20001419%$4,340
17IntelligenceElsevier BV · United States
1.25Q22.08 1.29 up from 2000680%$3,530
18Second language ResearchSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.12Q20.97 0.22 up from 2000610%$3,650
19Learning and Individual DifferencesElsevier BV · United States
0.89Q20.86 0.34 up from 200055—$3,640
0.87Q20.32 0.08 up from 2000550%$3,650
21The Journal of Experimental EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
0.80Q20.70 0.03 down from 2000710%—
22Educational PsychologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.78Q20.43 0.20 down from 2000965%—
23Sleep Medicine ReviewsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.77Q21.33 0.02 down from 2000850%$5,950
24PhoneticaKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.76Q30.55 0.15 down from 20006233%$2,712
25The Journal of Creative BehaviorWiley · United States
0.72Q30.63 0.14 up from 2000555%$2,900
26Chronobiology InternationalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.72Q31.66 0.03 down from 20001694%—
27Creativity Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.63Q30.60 0.19 down from 2000682%—
28Roeper ReviewRoutledge · United States
0.54Q30.41 0.26 down from 20001772%—
0.48Q30.26 0.18 down from 2000649%—
30journal for the education of the giftedSAGE Publishing · United States
0.43Q30.33 0.32 down from 20001154%$3,650
0.39Q30.16 0.06 up from 2000480%—
32High Ability StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.38Q30.35 0.87 down from 2000434%—
0.37Q30.31 0.09 up from 20006694%—
0.30Q30.12 0.07 up from 2000370%—
35Metaphor and SymbolRoutledge · United States
0.30Q30.49 0.56 down from 20005913%—
36Journal of the International Phonetic AssociationCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.28Q40.14 0.09 up from 20005021%$3,550
37Biological Rhythm ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.27Q40.86 0.56 up from 20001302%—
38SemioticaOADe Gruyter · Germany
0.26Q40.15 0.04 up from 20003223%$0 listed
39AVSPPublisher not listed
0.24Q40.35 0.07 up from 2000470%—
40Somnologie - Schlafforschung und SchlafmedizinSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.15Q40.52 0.08 down from 2000960%$3,390
41Gifted Education InternationalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.12Q40.04 0.28 down from 2000816%$3,400
42AxiomathesSpringer Nature · Netherlands
0.10Q40.05 0.02 up from 2000465%$2,990
43Journal of Literary SemanticsDe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
0.06Q40.02 0.06 down from 2000594%$2,712
44Journal of Dance Medicine & ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
0.05Q40.50 0.20 up from 200070100%$3,650
45TheoriaWiley · Sweden
0.03Q40.03 0.03 up from 2000495%$3,240
46DisputatioOAUniversity of Lisbon · Portugal
0.00Q40.00no change37100%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
46
Window papers (baseline)
15,884 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.77 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals46464950525557586266697179818589929799999998102105104103
Window papers (baseline)14,72915,88417,22518,82419,98721,36723,17625,74728,75531,86934,46837,29339,97242,00343,85945,32148,04349,49150,73851,22753,19856,39260,48663,68465,59068,101
Median OJR0.8540.770.810.9100.780.8620.980.920.9030.99991.041.200.970.931.331.090.991.021.010.8600.940.9020.9060.820.8480.856

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.