OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journal rankings 2025

103 ranked journals · Subfield in Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology has 103 ranked journals in 2025. The median journal has an OJR of 0.86, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.01 on 2024; Q1 starts at OJR 1.44. No journal’s likely rank range stays within the top 3, so the intro names none.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

103
10% of Psychology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.86+0.01 vs 2024
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

28%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,210
Median positive listed APC: $3,210 among 59 journals. Another 5 list $0; 39 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Psychology (7)

103 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #9 of 103Learning and Individual DifferencesElsevier BV · United States
6.32Q112.84 0.88 down from 202431664%$3,640
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #4 of 103Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological ScienceOASAGE Publishing · United States
5.73Q111.72 3.47 down from 202494100%$2,000
Rank 3; likely between #1 and #9 of 103Journal of CreativityOAElsevier BV · South Korea
4.86Q113.59 6.66 up from 202465100%$1,560
Rank 4; likely between #2 and #8 of 103Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.97Q15.80 2.95 down from 202427050%—
Rank 5; likely between #3 and #6 of 103IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.55Q18.96 0.29 down from 202442721%$2,645Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 6; likely between #4 and #9 of 103Thinking Skills and CreativityElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.12Q16.91 0.91 down from 202458433%$3,730Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 7; likely between #4 and #10 of 103British Journal of Educational PsychologyWiley · United Kingdom
3.02Q14.81 0.32 up from 202422773%$3,760
Rank 8; likely between #6 and #11 of 103Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.74Q14.61 0.07 down from 202420453%$4,720Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 9; likely between #5 and #18 of 103Educational PsychologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.45Q12.73 0.83 down from 202417228%—
Rank 10; likely between #7 and #20 of 103Creativity Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
2.28Q15.40 1.57 up from 202418840%—
Rank 11; likely between #8 and #19 of 103Journal of IntelligenceOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
2.21Q15.18 0.26 up from 2024473100%$3,137
Rank 12; likely between #9 and #19 of 103Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesElsevier BV · United States
2.15Q14.28 0.02 down from 202411844%$3,530Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 13; likely between #6 and #31 of 103Sleep Medicine ClinicsElsevier BV · United States
2.02Q12.94 2.29 down from 202418330%$2,950
Rank 14; likely between #9 and #26 of 103The Journal of Creative BehaviorWiley · United States
1.93Q14.58 1.14 up from 202416853%$2,900
Rank 15; likely between #11 and #21 of 103Sleep Medicine ReviewsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.91Q110.66 0.35 up from 202429543%$5,950
Rank 16; likely between #12 and #21 of 103EmotionAmerican Psychological Association · United States
1.85Q13.53 0.03 down from 202442830%—
Rank 17; likely between #5 and #45 of 103Collabra PsychologyOAUniversity of California Press · United States
1.77Q12.58 1.38 down from 2024294100%$975
Rank 18; likely between #11 and #29 of 103Gifted Child QuarterlySAGE Publishing · United States
1.77Q14.50 1.41 up from 20247549%$1,400
Rank 19; likely between #6 and #43 of 103Language and Linguistics CompassWiley · United Kingdom
1.75Q12.02 0.17 up from 20246475%$2,900
Rank 20; likely between #7 and #53 of 103Philosophical PerspectivesWiley · United States
1.65Q12.44 0.06 down from 202450100%$2,760
Rank 21; likely between #16 and #29 of 103Sleep HealthElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.57Q14.25 1.02 up from 202437455%$3,000
Rank 22; likely between #11 and #44 of 103Journal of World LanguagesOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.55Q11.51 0.41 down from 202487100%$0 listed
Rank 23; likely between #16 and #30 of 103Journal of Sleep ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.52Q14.78 0.17 up from 202485877%$4,340
Rank 24; likely between #16 and #32 of 103Evolution and Human BehaviorElsevier BV · United States
1.52Q13.01 0.42 down from 202417852%$4,330Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 25; likely between #14 and #43 of 103Metaphor and SymbolRoutledge · United States
1.46Q13.24 0.73 down from 20246344%—
Rank 26; likely between #16 and #39 of 103Multivariate Behavioral ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
1.44Q13.32 0.28 up from 202417347%—
Rank 27; likely between #20 and #35 of 103Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the ArtsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
1.39Q22.90 0.06 down from 202427332%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 28; likely between #22 and #33 of 103SLEEPOxford University Press · United States
1.35Q24.19 0.58 up from 202491991%$4,388Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 29; likely between #24 and #35 of 103Nature and Science of SleepOADove Medical Press · New Zealand
1.31Q23.59 0.27 down from 2024451100%$2,836
Rank 30; likely between #20 and #47 of 103Possibility Studies & SocietySAGE Publishing
1.24Q22.25 1.45 down from 202410359%$3,400
Rank 31; likely between #19 and #52 of 103Second language ResearchSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.23Q21.80 0.04 down from 20249153%$3,650
Rank 32; likely between #28 and #37 of 103Sleep MedicineElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.21Q24.15 1.00 up from 20241,23139%$4,350Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 33; likely between #23 and #45 of 103Human NatureSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.20Q22.07 0.52 down from 20246573%$2,190
Rank 34; likely between #21 and #53 of 103Cognitive LinguisticsOADe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
1.17Q21.69 0.22 up from 202459100%$0 listed
Rank 35; likely between #23 and #48 of 103IntelligenceElsevier BV · United States
1.16Q23.46 0.01 up from 202413553%$3,530
Rank 36; likely between #23 and #54 of 103Current Sleep Medicine ReportsSpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland
1.12Q24.03 1.05 up from 20248538%$3,890
Rank 37; likely between #7 and #97 of 103PhonologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.06Q20.67 0.38 up from 20244182%$3,550
Rank 38; likely between #29 and #50 of 103SLEEP AdvancesOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.05Q22.14 0.28 down from 2024196100%$2,054
Rank 39; likely between #30 and #50 of 103Journal of PhoneticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.05Q22.52 0.47 down from 202413263%$3,210
Rank 40; likely between #21 and #64 of 103Language and Semiotic StudiesOAWalter de Gruyter
1.04Q22.02 1.05 up from 202489100%$0 listed
Rank 41; likely between #25 and #58 of 103journal for the education of the giftedSAGE Publishing · United States
1.04Q21.91 0.25 up from 20245253%$3,650
Rank 42; likely between #24 and #64 of 103Sleep Medicine XOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.98Q22.27 0.01 down from 202489100%$2,890
Rank 43; likely between #35 and #51 of 103Cognitive Therapy and ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.98Q22.36 0.02 down from 202427356%$4,090
Rank 44; likely between #33 and #55 of 103The Journal of Experimental EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
0.97Q21.73 0.20 down from 202414033%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 45; likely between #34 and #57 of 103Clocks & SleepOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
0.93Q23.82 1.04 up from 2024154100%$1,930
Rank 46; likely between #14 and #84 of 103International Journal of Language and CultureJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
0.91Q20.65 0.28 up from 20243814%—
Rank 47; likely between #33 and #61 of 103Gifted Education InternationalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.91Q22.10 0.06 down from 20246740%$3,400
Rank 48; likely between #30 and #69 of 103Journal for Person-Oriented ResearchOASweden
0.89Q21.85 0.44 down from 202432100%—
Rank 49; likely between #38 and #58 of 103Language and CognitionOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.88Q21.93 0.25 up from 2024157100%$3,550
Rank 50; likely between #40 and #58 of 103Behavioral Sleep MedicineTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.87Q21.98 0.19 up from 202414545%—Falling vs field, 2022–25

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

22 additional Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
103
Window papers (baseline)
68,101 +12.6% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.856 -5.5% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals46464950525557586266697179818589929799999998102105104103
Window papers (baseline)14,72915,88417,22518,82419,98721,36723,17625,74728,75531,86934,46837,29339,97242,00343,85945,32148,04349,49150,73851,22753,19856,39260,48663,68465,59068,101
Median OJR0.8540.770.810.9100.780.8620.980.920.9030.99991.041.200.970.931.331.090.991.021.010.8600.940.9020.9060.820.8480.856

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.