OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2000

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2000

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journal rankings 2000

46 ranked journals · Subfield in Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology has 46 ranked journals in 2000. The median journal has an OJR of 0.85, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.63. The top three are Human Nature, Evolution and Human Behavior, and Multivariate Behavioral Research.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.

46
9% of Psychology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.85
This subfieldAll 0.66World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

9%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,595
Median positive listed APC: $3,595 among 28 journals. Another 2 list $0; 16 have no known price. All fields: $3,570.

Subfields of Psychology (7)

46 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ranking, 2000

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000.

Compare
1Human NatureSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.53Q11.87no 1999 value460%$2,190—
2Evolution and Human BehaviorElsevier BV · United States
2.79Q12.33no 1999 value890%$4,330—
3Multivariate Behavioral ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
2.79Q11.42no 1999 value6214%——
4Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
2.64Q11.96no 1999 value1700%——
2.19Q11.82no 1999 value1784%$3,530—
6PhonologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
2.12Q11.48no 1999 value420%$3,550—
7Gifted Child QuarterlySAGE Publishing · United States
2.01Q11.37no 1999 value680%$1,400—
8Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.95Q11.24no 1999 value806%$4,720—
9Language and SpeechSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.87Q11.32no 1999 value610%$3,650—
1.82Q11.05no 1999 value1184%$3,760—
11SLEEPOxford University Press · United States
1.73Q13.11no 1999 value23018%$4,388—
12Cognitive LinguisticsOADe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
1.63Q10.67no 1999 value370%$0 listed—
13Journal of PhoneticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.53Q21.56no 1999 value6112%$3,210—
14journal for the education of the giftedSAGE Publishing · United States
1.44Q20.65no 1999 value950%$3,650—
15Educational PsychologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.38Q20.63no 1999 value953%——
16Second language ResearchSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.38Q20.75no 1999 value625%$3,650—
17High Ability StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.38Q21.22no 1999 value510%——
18IntelligenceElsevier BV · United States
1.17Q20.79no 1999 value876%$3,530—
19Journal of Sleep ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.16Q22.03no 1999 value1239%$4,340—
20Cognitive Therapy and ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.09Q20.90no 1999 value1336%$4,090—
21The Journal of Experimental EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
1.01Q20.72no 1999 value674%——
22Metaphor and SymbolRoutledge · United States
0.91Q21.05no 1999 value590%——
0.86Q20.43no 1999 value560%——
24PhoneticaKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.85Q30.70no 1999 value4626%$2,712—
25Roeper ReviewRoutledge · United States
0.82Q30.67no 1999 value1740%——
26Creativity Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.79Q30.79no 1999 value119———
27The Journal of Creative BehaviorWiley · United States
0.75Q30.49no 1999 value644%$2,900—
28Learning and Individual DifferencesElsevier BV · United States
0.74Q30.51no 1999 value570%$3,640—
29Sleep Medicine ReviewsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.67Q31.36no 1999 value555%$5,950—
30Chronobiology InternationalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.58Q31.69no 1999 value1670%——
31Gifted Education InternationalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.41Q30.32no 1999 value730%$3,400—
32SemioticaOADe Gruyter · Germany
0.33Q30.11no 1999 value3511%$0 listed—
33Journal of Literary SemanticsDe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
0.33Q30.08no 1999 value564%$2,712—
0.31Q30.22no 1999 value6092%——
0.30Q30.24no 1999 value455%$3,650—
0.29Q40.10no 1999 value410%——
37AVSPPublisher not listed
0.25Q40.28no 1999 value69———
38Philosophia MathematicaOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.22Q40.13no 1999 value700%$4,533—
39Journal of Dance Medicine & ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
0.21Q40.30no 1999 value72100%$3,650—
40Journal of the International Phonetic AssociationCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.21Q40.06no 1999 value4741%$3,550—
41Biological Rhythm ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.15Q40.29no 1999 value1370%——
42Somnologie - Schlafforschung und SchlafmedizinSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.13Q40.61no 1999 value930%$3,390—
43TheoriaWiley · Sweden
0.11Q40.00no 1999 value424%$3,240—
0.07Q40.05no 1999 value310%——
45DisputatioOAUniversity of Lisbon · Portugal
0.00Q40.00no 1999 value37100%——
45AxiomathesSpringer Nature · Netherlands
0.00Q40.03no 1999 value6013%$2,990—

Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

10 additional Experimental and Cognitive Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
46
Window papers (baseline)
14,729 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Median OJR
0.854 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals46464950525557586266697179818589929799999998102105104103
Window papers (baseline)14,72915,88417,22518,82419,98721,36723,17625,74728,75531,86934,46837,29339,97242,00343,85945,32148,04349,49150,73851,22753,19856,39260,48663,68465,59068,101
Median OJR0.8540.770.810.9100.780.8620.980.920.9030.99991.041.200.970.931.331.090.991.021.010.8600.940.9020.9060.820.8480.856

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.