OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2009

Geography, Planning and Development journal rankings 2009

18 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Geography, Planning and Development has 18 ranked journals in 2009. The median OJR rose 0.39 on 2008 to 1.41, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.07. The top three are Progress in Human Geography, New Zealand Geographer, and Cultural Geographies.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

18
<1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.41+0.39 vs 2008
This subfieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,420
Median positive listed APC: $3,420 among 4 journals. 14 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

18 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Geography, Planning and Development ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
1Progress in Human GeographySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
9.57Q14.46 0.50 up from 200819810%$3,900
2New Zealand GeographerWiley · Australia
5.28Q13.58 2.78 up from 200815520%$2,900
3Cultural GeographiesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.53Q11.90 0.68 down from 2008956%$3,650
4Journal of Geography in Higher EducationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.99Q11.42 0.02 down from 200810330%—
5Asian perspectivesUniversity of Hawaii Press · United States
2.07Q11.43 0.81 up from 20086782%—
1.98Q21.24 0.65 down from 2008635%—
1.54Q20.70 0.02 up from 20081257%—
8The Cartographic JournalTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.51Q20.76 0.19 up from 20089328%—
9Cartography and Geographic Information ScienceTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.42Q21.13 0.09 down from 20087314%—
10Journal of GeographyNational Council for Geographic Education · United States
1.40Q30.69 0.14 up from 20089911%—
0.99Q30.35 0.08 up from 2008889%—
12GeographyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.81Q30.43 0.01 up from 20081076%—
13Journal of Geoscience EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
0.50Q30.45 0.14 up from 20082124%—
14Scottish Geographical JournalTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.37Q30.37 0.04 down from 20089027%—
15Journal of Map & Geography LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.23Q40.16 0.07 up from 2008505%—
16KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic InformationSpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland
0.20Q40.49 0.29 up from 2008750%$3,190
17The Geography TeacherRoutledge · United States
0.08Q40.07 0.01 down from 20085212%—
18Geodetski listSpringer Nature (Netherlands) · Croatia
0.04Q40.06 0.06 up from 2008320%—

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Geography, Planning and Development journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
18
Window papers (baseline)
15,406 +23.9% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
1.41 +73.3% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1214151615151717181818202425252527282931333334333534
Window papers (baseline)8,3629,1179,72110,32310,97511,52112,43713,17914,22415,40616,68617,87418,95719,95921,19221,95323,26825,24027,50430,03932,43135,45638,00839,17240,42040,571
Median OJR0.830.900.6290.790.820.870.8120.8141.021.411.351.331.031.281.071.401.221.141.111.260.840.7140.7110.590.6350.69

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.