Journal rankings · indicator year 2009
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2009
Demography journal rankings 2009
29 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences
Demography has 29 ranked journals in 2009. The median journal has an OJR of 0.90, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.04 on 2008; Q1 starts at OJR 1.39. The top three are Journal of Economic Growth, Demographic Research, and Population Studies.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Social Sciences (22)
29 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Journal of Economic GrowthSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 12.13Q1 | 6.42 1.49 up from 2008 | 37 | 50% | $4,290 | ||
2Demographic ResearchOAMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research · Germany | 4.05Q1 | 2.82 0.75 up from 2008 | 175 | 100% | — | ||
3Population StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 3.84Q1 | 2.83 0.10 up from 2008 | 62 | 29% | — | ||
4European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de DémographieSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 2.79Q1 | 1.75 0.48 up from 2008 | 79 | 39% | $2,990 | ||
5Fathering A Journal of Theory Research and Practice about Men as FathersMen's Studies Press · United States | 2.56Q1 | 1.24 0.28 up from 2008 | 42 | 24% | — | ||
6Population Health MetricsOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 2.07Q1 | 3.00 0.37 down from 2008 | 37 | 100% | $2,890 | ||
7Journal of Population ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Australia | 1.79Q1 | 0.68 0.11 down from 2008 | 43 | 13% | $3,190 | ||
8Journal of Elder Abuse & NeglectTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.39Q1 | 0.76 0.38 up from 2008 | 66 | 5% | — | ||
9Journal of Technology in Human ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.36Q2 | 1.17 0.37 up from 2008 | 75 | 6% | — | ||
10Family Court ReviewWiley · United Kingdom | 1.09Q2 | 0.76 0.11 up from 2008 | 154 | 7% | $2,900 | ||
11The Journal of Adult ProtectionEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 1.06Q2 | 0.46 0.15 down from 2008 | 62 | 0% | — | ||
12North American Actuarial JournalTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.03Q2 | 0.96 0.34 down from 2008 | 158 | 11% | — | ||
13Annals of Actuarial ScienceCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.96Q2 | 0.76 0.26 up from 2008 | 50 | 25% | $3,550 | ||
14Marriage & Family ReviewTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.91Q2 | 0.35 0.18 down from 2008 | 147 | 8% | — | ||
15Journal of Divorce & RemarriageHaworth Press · United States | 0.90Q2 | 0.45 0.10 down from 2008 | 112 | 9% | — | ||
16OceaniaWiley · Australia | 0.88Q3 | 0.64 0.29 up from 2008 | 85 | 12% | $2,900 | ||
17GenerationsPublisher not listed | 0.80Q3 | 0.48 0.20 up from 2008 | 173 | 0% | — | ||
18Island Studies JournalOAUniversity of Prince Edward Island · Canada | 0.78Q3 | 0.31 0.20 down from 2008 | 49 | 100% | — | ||
19Journal of Management Spirituality & ReligionTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.66Q3 | 0.48 0.20 up from 2008 | 79 | 11% | — | ||
20Canadian Studies in PopulationSpringer Nature · Canada | 0.66Q3 | 0.23 0.02 up from 2008 | 42 | 100% | $3,290 | ||
21The Contemporary Pacific/The contemporary Pacific (Online)University of Hawaii Press · United States | 0.65Q3 | 0.27 0.35 down from 2008 | 164 | 8% | — | ||
22Documents d Anàlisi GeogràficaOAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografia · Spain | 0.49Q3 | 0.31 0.19 up from 2008 | 111 | 100% | — | ||
23Journal of Child CustodyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.48Q4 | 0.31 1.12 down from 2008 | 52 | 6% | — | ||
24Population reviewUnited States | 0.47Q4 | 0.48 0.30 up from 2008 | 33 | 69% | — | ||
25GerontechnologyOAInternational Society for Gerontechnology · Netherlands | 0.40Q4 | 0.35 0.04 down from 2008 | 399 | 5% | — | ||
26Journal of Housing for the ElderlyTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.35Q4 | 0.40 0.08 up from 2008 | 69 | 26% | — | ||
27Activities Adaptation & AgingTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.27Q4 | 0.19 0.07 down from 2008 | 52 | 0% | — | ||
28Working with Older PeopleEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 0.21Q4 | 0.15 0.09 up from 2008 | 94 | 4% | — | ||
29Journal of Jewish EducationTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.14Q4 | 0.11 0.14 down from 2008 | 59 | 4% | — |
Subfields of Social Sciences, with Demography highlighted.
- Sociology and Political Science899
- Education464
- Political Science and International Relations260
- Gender Studies50
- Communication48
- Public Administration48
- Safety Research39
- Linguistics and Language38
- Health36
- Library and Information Sciences36
- Anthropology35
- Law34
- Transportation33
- Demography29
- Urban Studies28
- Geography, Planning and Development18
- Cultural Studies9
- Development3
- General Social Sciences3
- Human Factors and Ergonomics1
- Archeology0
- Life-span and Life-course Studies0
Journals
Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
11 additional Demography journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 29
- Window papers (baseline)
- 30,132 +47.6% from indicator year 2006
- Median OJR
- 0.90 +32.7% from indicator year 2006
- Rising journals (2025)
- 1
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 16 | 16 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 22 | 27 | 27 | 29 | 29 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 34 | 36 | 40 | 41 | 40 | 40 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 38 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 11,451 | 12,474 | 13,762 | 15,170 | 16,495 | 18,279 | 20,414 | 23,197 | 26,386 | 30,132 | 33,639 | 37,483 | 41,523 | 45,909 | 48,822 | 52,017 | 54,629 | 57,668 | 61,173 | 67,052 | 75,599 | 86,076 | 98,735 | 110,640 | 123,603 | 129,610 | |
| Median OJR | 0.711 | 0.854 | 0.72 | 0.683 | 0.56 | 0.708 | 0.680 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 1.060 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.13 | 1.056 | 1.04 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.846 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.