OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2014

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2014

Demography journal rankings 2014

36 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Demography has 36 ranked journals in 2014. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.23 against 1.00, down 0.04 on 2013. A journal needs OJR 2.14 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of Economic Growth, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, and Population Studies.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2014. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 score is computed on.

36
1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.23-0.04 vs 2013
This subfieldAll 0.90World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

19%
All fields: 27%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,090
Median positive listed APC: $3,090 among 11 journals. 25 have no known price. All fields: $3,400.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

36 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Demography ranking, 2014

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2013. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2011–2013 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2005 to 2014.

Compare
1Journal of Economic GrowthSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
7.50Q14.17 0.10 up from 20134325%$4,290
2European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de DémographieSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
4.72Q12.42 0.76 up from 20137037%$2,990
3Population StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.93Q12.50 0.41 up from 20139230%—
4Journal of Elder Abuse & NeglectTaylor & Francis · United States
3.80Q11.40 0.13 down from 20138417%—
5Population Health MetricsOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
3.52Q15.80 2.18 up from 2013106100%$2,890
6Demographic ResearchOAMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research · Germany
3.30Q12.49 0.46 up from 2013206100%—
2.66Q11.73 0.76 up from 2013490%—
8North American Actuarial JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
2.22Q11.04 0.81 down from 2013819%—
9Journal of Divorce & RemarriageHaworth Press · United States
2.14Q11.21 0.12 up from 20131149%—
10Journal of Population AgeingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.98Q21.35 0.84 up from 20134719%$3,190
11Island Studies JournalOAUniversity of Prince Edward Island · Canada
1.96Q20.94 0.16 down from 201348100%—
12Contemporary JewrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.94Q21.10 0.60 up from 20134519%$3,090
13Journal of Management Spirituality & ReligionTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.77Q21.00 0.52 down from 2013647%—
14OceaniaWiley · Australia
1.71Q20.45 0.22 down from 2013725%$2,900
15Journal of Technology in Human ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.51Q21.93 0.47 up from 2013614%—
16Journal of Housing for the ElderlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.46Q21.00 0.35 up from 20136515%—
17The Journal of Adult ProtectionEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.36Q21.02 0.48 up from 2013858%—
18European Actuarial JournalSpringer Nature · Germany
1.24Q20.84 0.10 down from 20137716%$2,290
19Family Court ReviewWiley · United Kingdom
1.22Q30.62 0.13 down from 20131889%$2,900
20Population reviewUnited States
1.16Q31.03 0.33 up from 2013500%—
21Marriage & Family ReviewTaylor & Francis · United States
1.13Q31.04 0.26 up from 201310511%—
22Journal of Population ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Australia
1.11Q30.74 0.31 down from 20136428%$3,190
23Documents d Anàlisi GeogràficaOAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografia · Spain
1.06Q30.63 0.02 up from 2013170100%—
24Journal of Marine and Island CulturesOAMokpo National University · Netherlands
0.96Q30.91 0.47 up from 201332100%—
25Annals of Actuarial ScienceCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.93Q30.64 0.03 up from 20136150%$3,550
26˜The œContemporary Pacific/˜The œcontemporary Pacific (Online)University of Hawaii Press · United States
0.75Q30.30 0.03 down from 201314422%—
27Journal of Child CustodyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.72Q30.76 0.33 up from 2013449%—
28GenerationsPublisher not listed
0.60Q40.68 0.46 up from 20131680%—
29Canadian Studies in PopulationSpringer Nature · Canada
0.59Q40.48 0.19 down from 201354100%$3,290
30Activities Adaptation & AgingTaylor & Francis · United States
0.52Q40.76 0.33 up from 2013916%—
31Working with Older PeopleEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
0.42Q40.37 0.08 down from 2013650%—
32Journal of Jewish EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
0.26Q40.19 0.02 up from 2013633%—
33GerontechnologyOAInternational Society for Gerontechnology · Netherlands
0.25Q40.25 0.01 up from 201356952%—
34WEEF 2013 CartagenaPublisher not listed
0.12Q40.06no 2013 value90———
35Perspectives on GerontologyAmerican Speech–Language–Hearing Association · United States
0.06Q40.09 0.05 down from 20134111%—
36Anthropology & AgingOAUniversity Library System, University of Pittsburgh · United States
0.05Q40.03 0.03 up from 201333100%—

Citations made in 2014. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

14 additional Demography journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2011–2013, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2014. Publication window: 2011–2013. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
36
Window papers (baseline)
48,822 +30.3% from indicator year 2011
Median OJR
1.23 +15.9% from indicator year 2011
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2011–2013 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1616222224222727292931313334364041404038404239404038
Window papers (baseline)11,45112,47413,76215,17016,49518,27920,41423,19726,38630,13233,63937,48341,52345,90948,82252,01754,62957,66861,17367,05275,59986,07698,735110,640123,603129,610
Median OJR0.7110.8540.720.6830.560.7080.6800.840.860.901.091.0601.161.271.231.211.141.131.0561.040.970.910.830.740.820.846

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.