OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2019

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2019

Demography journal rankings 2019

38 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Demography has 38 ranked journals in 2019. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.04 against 1.00, down 0.01 on 2018. A journal needs OJR 2.34 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of Economic Growth, Work Aging and Retirement, and European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2019. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 score is computed on.

38
1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.04-0.01 vs 2018
This subfieldAll 0.82World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

24%
All fields: 34%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,140
Median positive listed APC: $3,140 among 14 journals. 24 have no known price. All fields: $3,310.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

38 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Demography ranking, 2019

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2018. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2016–2018 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2010 to 2019.

Compare
1Journal of Economic GrowthSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
9.82Q13.95 3.49 down from 20183446%$4,290
2Work Aging and RetirementOxford University Press · United Kingdom
4.67Q12.79 0.20 down from 20188536%$4,177
3European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de DémographieSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.84Q13.00 0.90 up from 2018134100%$2,990
4Journal of Elder Abuse & NeglectTaylor & Francis · United States
3.44Q11.84 0.28 down from 20186117%—
5Journal of Management Spirituality & ReligionTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.43Q11.95 0.11 down from 20188027%—
2.97Q12.56 1.03 up from 2018134100%$1,810
7Demographic ResearchOAMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research · Germany
2.69Q12.40 0.42 up from 2018334100%—
8Population StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.66Q12.89 0.89 up from 20189765%—
9Population Health MetricsOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
2.40Q14.46 0.59 up from 2018108100%$2,890
10Journal of Population ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Australia
2.34Q11.03 0.28 down from 20185919%$3,190
11The Journal of the Economics of AgeingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.14Q21.68 0.11 up from 201811253%$3,380
12Island Studies JournalOAUniversity of Prince Edward Island · Canada
2.14Q22.14 0.68 up from 2018135100%—
13Journal of Population AgeingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.04Q21.63 0.41 up from 20187348%$3,190
14Journal of Divorce & RemarriageHaworth Press · United States
1.44Q21.24 0.31 up from 20181359%—
15Marriage & Family ReviewTaylor & Francis · United States
1.27Q21.21 0.72 down from 20181239%—
16Journal of Housing for the ElderlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.18Q21.49 0.19 up from 20187930%—
17Documents d Anàlisi GeogràficaOAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografia · Spain
1.11Q20.57 0.02 up from 2018128100%—
18European Actuarial JournalSpringer Nature · Germany
1.11Q21.39 0.49 up from 20186529%$2,290
19North American Actuarial JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
1.05Q21.16 0.40 up from 20188819%—
20The Journal of Adult ProtectionEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.04Q31.43 0.41 up from 20188540%—
21Journal of Technology in Human ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.03Q31.53 0.45 up from 20185724%—
22Family Court ReviewWiley · United Kingdom
1.00Q31.18 0.25 up from 201811221%$2,900
23Working with Older PeopleEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
0.94Q30.98 0.08 up from 20188825%—
24˜The œContemporary Pacific/˜The œcontemporary Pacific (Online)University of Hawaii Press · United States
0.90Q30.62 0.43 up from 201814926%—
25Activities Adaptation & AgingTaylor & Francis · United States
0.85Q31.42 0.65 up from 2018785%—
26Journal of Child CustodyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.75Q31.13 0.71 up from 20185319%—
27Journal of Marine and Island CulturesOAMokpo National University · Netherlands
0.73Q30.41 0.34 down from 201847100%—
28GenerationsPublisher not listed
0.68Q30.71 0.26 up from 2018950%—
29ShimaOAShima Publishing · Australia
0.62Q30.35 0.07 up from 201872100%—
30Research on Ageing and Social PolicyOAHipatia Press · Spain
0.61Q40.84 0.21 down from 201830100%—
31Canadian Studies in PopulationSpringer Nature · Canada
0.56Q40.40 0.07 down from 20185419%$3,290
32OceaniaWiley · Australia
0.55Q40.38 0.06 up from 20188122%$2,900
0.49Q41.17 0.75 up from 201849100%—
34Journal of Jewish EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
0.48Q40.40 0.03 down from 20185619%—
35Annals of Actuarial ScienceCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.47Q40.57 0.01 up from 20187462%$3,550
36Contemporary JewrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.43Q40.38 0.09 up from 201810627%$3,090
37GerontechnologyOAInternational Society for Gerontechnology · Netherlands
0.17Q40.20no change476100%—
0.17Q40.26 0.05 up from 201811610%—

Citations made in 2019. Corpus-wide, 83.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

8 additional Demography journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2016–2018, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2019. Publication window: 2016–2018. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
38
Window papers (baseline)
67,052 +22.7% from indicator year 2016
Median OJR
1.04 -8.7% from indicator year 2016
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2016–2018 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1616222224222727292931313334364041404038404239404038
Window papers (baseline)11,45112,47413,76215,17016,49518,27920,41423,19726,38630,13233,63937,48341,52345,90948,82252,01754,62957,66861,17367,05275,59986,07698,735110,640123,603129,610
Median OJR0.7110.8540.720.6830.560.7080.6800.840.860.901.091.0601.161.271.231.211.141.131.0561.040.970.910.830.740.820.846

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.