OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2014

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2014

Linguistics and Language journal rankings 2014

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Linguistics and Language has 41 ranked journals in 2014. The median OJR rose 0.21 on 2013 to 2.37, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.95. The top three are Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Journal of English Linguistics, and TESOL Quarterly.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2014. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 score is computed on.

41
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

2.37+0.21 vs 2013
This subfieldAll 0.90World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

7%
All fields: 27%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 18 journals. 23 have no known price. All fields: $3,400.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Linguistics and Language ranking, 2014

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2013. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2011–2013 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2005 to 2014.

Compare
1Annual Review of Applied LinguisticsCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
11.34Q17.55 4.15 up from 20135120%$3,550
2Journal of English LinguisticsSAGE Publishing · United States
5.94Q12.13 1.25 up from 2013368%$3,650
3TESOL QuarterlyWiley · United States
5.07Q12.09 0.02 up from 201319419%$2,850
4Journal of SociolinguisticsWiley · United Kingdom
4.98Q11.73 0.09 up from 201312818%$3,730
4.56Q11.57 0.93 up from 201318910%$2,712
4.45Q11.92 0.15 up from 20131478%—
7English Language and LinguisticsCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
4.16Q12.23 1.61 up from 20139028%$3,550
8Applied LinguisticsOxford University Press · United Kingdom
4.14Q12.26 0.84 up from 201319811%$5,481
9Applied Linguistics ReviewDe Gruyter · Germany
3.41Q11.19 0.75 down from 20134724%$2,712
10Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural DevelopmentTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.20Q11.25 0.02 down from 20132567%—
11Language Variation and ChangeCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
2.95Q13.07 0.79 up from 20136333%$3,550
12MultilinguaDe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
2.87Q20.92 0.64 up from 20131128%$2,712
13International Multilingual Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
2.67Q20.91 0.68 down from 2013438%—
14Language and Intercultural CommunicationRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.66Q21.21 0.29 up from 20137717%—
15World EnglishesWiley · United Kingdom
2.58Q20.76 0.35 down from 201312215%$3,570
16Language PolicySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.57Q21.15 0.30 up from 201311813%$3,090
17Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyWiley · United States
2.46Q20.67 0.38 down from 2013756%$3,400
2.42Q20.73 0.64 down from 2013560%—
19Current Issues in Language PlanningTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.40Q20.93 0.12 down from 20138416%—
20Linguistics and EducationElsevier BV · United States
2.38Q20.97 0.13 up from 20131316%$2,620
21Journal of Language Identity & EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
2.37Q20.77 0.14 up from 2013806%—
22Language Problems & Language PlanningJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
2.31Q30.19 0.24 down from 2013854%—
2.26Q31.15 0.13 up from 2013759%—
24International Journal of MultilingualismRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.13Q30.94 0.30 down from 20137714%—
25Journal of Multicultural DiscoursesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.05Q30.81 0.29 down from 20136517%—
26AlsicOAMarc Bloch University · France
1.96Q31.07 0.13 down from 201338100%—
27Language in SocietyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.68Q30.72 0.09 up from 201324017%$3,550
28American SpeechDuke University Press · United States
1.67Q30.41 0.10 up from 2013934%—
29International Journal of BilingualismSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.67Q31.41 0.26 up from 201314530%$3,650
30Bilingual Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
1.54Q31.11 0.18 down from 2013630%—
31English TodayCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.47Q30.76 0.23 up from 201314726%$3,550
32English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of EnglishJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Germany
1.44Q40.59 0.04 down from 2013770%—
33Linguistic Approaches to BilingualismJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
1.28Q40.86 0.93 down from 20139514%—
34Sociolinguistic StudiesEquinox Publishing · United Kingdom
1.05Q40.37 0.05 up from 20138015%—
35Journal of Language ContactOABrill · France
1.01Q40.41 0.13 up from 20135012%—
36Critical Inquiry in Language StudiesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.00Q40.37 0.22 down from 2013470%—
37OLBI JournalOACanada
0.53Q40.29 0.07 up from 201335——
0.53Q40.31 0.06 up from 20133897%—
39Oceanic LinguisticsUniversity of Hawaii Press · United States
0.47Q40.44 0.07 up from 20138223%—
0.47Q40.19 0.16 up from 20134712%$2,712
41Asian EnglishesTaylor & Francis
0.31Q40.00 0.17 down from 20133011%—

Citations made in 2014. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Linguistics and Language journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2011–2013, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2014. Publication window: 2011–2013. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
15,201 +14.8% from indicator year 2011
Median OJR
2.37 +4.6% from indicator year 2011
Rising journals (2025)
5

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2011–2013 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2828293032303132353838383840414345474748494851494850
Window papers (baseline)5,8446,3376,7157,1847,5957,9338,4169,10810,16611,21212,40213,24414,10314,69615,20115,64116,48617,04217,82018,05819,09519,91120,33219,93819,42419,862
Median OJR0.971.100.992.751.5181.241.5151.631.741.732.092.272.302.162.372.452.902.622.592.842.532.021.611.871.862.14

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.