OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Linguistics and Language journal rankings 2015

43 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Linguistics and Language has 43 ranked journals in 2015. The median OJR rose 0.08 on 2014 to 2.45, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 3.36. The top three are World Englishes, Journal of English Linguistics, and TESOL Quarterly.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

43
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

2.45+0.08 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

7%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 18 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 24 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

43 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Linguistics and Language ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
1World EnglishesWiley · United Kingdom
6.59Q11.41 0.66 up from 20141099%$3,570
2Journal of English LinguisticsSAGE Publishing · United States
6.37Q12.15 0.02 up from 20143125%$3,650
3TESOL QuarterlyWiley · United States
4.67Q12.03 0.06 down from 20142037%$2,850
4Applied Linguistics ReviewDe Gruyter · Germany
4.51Q11.77 0.58 up from 20145142%$2,712
5Journal of SociolinguisticsWiley · United Kingdom
4.36Q11.88 0.15 up from 201412414%$3,730
4.32Q11.78 0.13 down from 201416224%—
7International Journal of MultilingualismRoutledge · United Kingdom
3.77Q12.15 1.21 up from 20148021%—
8Applied LinguisticsOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.75Q12.19 0.07 down from 201425110%$5,481
3.74Q11.24 0.01 down from 201428714%—
10Language and Intercultural CommunicationRoutledge · United Kingdom
3.63Q11.52 0.31 up from 20148115%—
3.36Q11.29 0.14 up from 2014736%—
12Annual Review of Applied LinguisticsCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
3.29Q21.52 6.03 down from 20144819%$3,550
13Linguistics and EducationElsevier BV · United States
3.27Q21.68 0.72 up from 20141267%$2,620
14MultilinguaDe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
3.27Q21.11 0.19 up from 201413930%$2,712
15English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of EnglishJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Germany
3.20Q21.14 0.55 up from 2014788%—
16Current Issues in Language PlanningTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.98Q21.00 0.07 up from 20149435%—
17International Multilingual Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
2.91Q21.04 0.13 up from 2014675%—
18Language Variation and ChangeCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
2.90Q21.60 1.48 down from 20146340%$3,550
19American SpeechDuke University Press · United States
2.86Q21.20 0.79 up from 2014847%—
20Language in SocietyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
2.78Q21.17 0.45 up from 201423422%$3,550
2.60Q20.79 0.78 down from 201419224%$2,712
22Language PolicySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.45Q21.07 0.08 down from 201411618%$3,090
23Journal of Language Identity & EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
2.44Q31.19 0.43 up from 20148216%—
24AlsicOAMarc Bloch University · France
2.34Q30.46 0.61 down from 201448100%—
2.28Q30.81 0.08 up from 2014505%—
26Linguistic Approaches to BilingualismJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
2.21Q31.38 0.52 up from 20149418%—
27Language Dynamics and ChangeBrill · Netherlands
2.18Q31.55 1.60 down from 20143223%—
28Bilingual Research JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
2.04Q31.66 0.55 up from 20145812%—
29Critical Inquiry in Language StudiesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.99Q30.77 0.40 up from 2014437%—
30Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyWiley · United States
1.91Q31.11 0.44 up from 20146612%$3,400
31English TodayCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.84Q30.57 0.20 down from 201415117%$3,550
32English Language and LinguisticsCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.80Q30.97 1.26 down from 20149631%$3,550
33International Journal of BilingualismSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.61Q31.10 0.31 down from 201414529%$3,650
1.44Q40.83 0.30 up from 20143043%$0 listed
35Sociolinguistic StudiesEquinox Publishing · United Kingdom
1.38Q40.40 0.03 up from 20149014%—
36Language Problems & Language PlanningJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
1.28Q40.38 0.19 up from 2014757%—
37Journal of Language ContactOABrill · France
1.26Q40.83 0.41 up from 20145623%—
38Journal of Multicultural DiscoursesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.99Q40.63 0.18 down from 20145713%—
39Oceanic LinguisticsUniversity of Hawaii Press · United States
0.69Q40.41 0.03 down from 2014757%—
40Asian EnglishesTaylor & Francis
0.60Q40.32 0.32 up from 2014387%—
0.47Q40.16 0.03 down from 2014548%$2,712
0.33Q40.07 0.24 down from 20145650%—
0.14Q40.11 0.11 up from 201432100%—

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Linguistics and Language journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
43
Window papers (baseline)
15,641 +10.9% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
2.45 +6.4% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
5

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2828293032303132353838383840414345474748494851494850
Window papers (baseline)5,8446,3376,7157,1847,5957,9338,4169,10810,16611,21212,40213,24414,10314,69615,20115,64116,48617,04217,82018,05819,09519,91120,33219,93819,42419,862
Median OJR0.971.100.992.751.5181.241.5151.631.741.732.092.272.302.162.372.452.902.622.592.842.532.021.611.871.862.14

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.