OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2014

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2014

Pharmaceutical Science journal rankings 2014

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Pharmaceutical Science has 41 ranked journals in 2014. The median journal has an OJR of 0.69, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.03 on 2013; Q1 starts at OJR 0.99. The top three are Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, and European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2014. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 score is computed on.

41
59% of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.69-0.03 vs 2013
This subfieldAll 0.90World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

32%
All fields: 27%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,940
Median positive listed APC: $3,940 among 12 journals. 29 have no known price. All fields: $3,400.

Subfields of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (4)

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pharmaceutical Science ranking, 2014

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2013. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2011–2013 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2005 to 2014.

Compare
1Expert Opinion on Drug DeliveryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.26Q15.08 0.27 up from 201337024%—
2.10Q16.32 1.50 up from 2013394%—
1.93Q14.23 0.15 up from 201376616%$4,210
4Journal of Drug DeliveryHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
1.92Q14.93 0.47 up from 2013101100%—
5International Journal of PharmaceuticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.76Q14.17 0.03 down from 20132,19713%$4,650
6European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.65Q13.72 0.65 up from 201383512%$3,070
7Pharmaceutical ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.62Q13.84 0.44 down from 201385529%$4,690
8AAPS PharmSciTechSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.08Q12.06 0.10 down from 201347897%$4,190
9Therapeutic DeliveryFuture Science Ltd · United Kingdom
1.02Q12.68 0.47 up from 201339516%—
10ISRN PharmaceuticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
1.01Q12.64 1.25 up from 201379100%—
11Results in Pharma SciencesElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.99Q12.00 0.92 up from 201330100%—
12Scientia PharmaceuticaOAÖsterreichische Apotheker-Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H. · Switzerland
0.95Q21.64 0.30 down from 2013208100%$1,207
13Journal of Fluorine ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.88Q22.19 0.19 up from 20137129%$3,660
14Current Drug DeliveryBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.86Q21.93 0.15 down from 20132005%—
15Journal of MicroencapsulationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.84Q21.78 0.34 down from 20132728%—
16Recent Patents on NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.78Q21.73 0.46 up from 2013810%—
17Drug DeliveryOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.78Q22.20 0.30 down from 201320297%$2,864
18Assay and Drug Development TechnologiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.77Q21.46 0.58 down from 201314558%—
19Journal of Pharmaceutical InnovationSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.70Q21.38 0.15 down from 2013718%$3,990
0.70Q21.23 0.52 up from 2013105100%—
21Drug Delivery and Translational ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.69Q21.57 0.08 up from 201317624%$4,690
22Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & FormulationBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.68Q31.15 0.28 down from 2013757%—
23Drug Development and Industrial PharmacyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.65Q31.62 0.27 down from 20137208%—
0.60Q30.57 0.43 down from 201310781%—
25Pharmaceutical Development and TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q31.29 0.23 up from 201336010%—
26Journal of PharmaceuticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.48Q30.95 0.37 up from 201344100%—
0.39Q30.71 0.57 up from 201331100%—
0.34Q30.29 0.66 down from 201381100%—
29Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationSpringer Science+Business Media · South Korea
0.32Q31.04 0.62 up from 20131610%$3,890
0.32Q30.58 0.22 down from 20132052%$3,810
31Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of São Paulo · Brazil
0.31Q30.57 0.12 up from 2013336100%—
32Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsOASociety of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats · India
0.30Q40.53 0.03 down from 2013389100%—
33Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and ResearchAssociation of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India · India
0.27Q40.54 0.08 down from 201390100%—
34Drug Delivery LettersBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.25Q40.69 0.38 up from 20131270%—
35Pharmaceutical NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.22Q40.43 0.15 up from 2013477%—
0.20Q40.38no 2013 value470%——
37Current Drug TherapyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.18Q40.35 0.05 down from 2013744%—
0.15Q40.40 0.10 up from 2013705%—
0.14Q40.35 0.16 down from 2013440%—
0.11Q40.31 0.31 up from 2013450%—
0.10Q40.06 0.13 down from 201371100%—

Citations made in 2014. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

18 additional Pharmaceutical Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2011–2013, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2014. Publication window: 2011–2013. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
16,907 +30.3% from indicator year 2011
Median OJR
0.6908 -21.5% from indicator year 2011
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2011–2013 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1316161616181920202223273136414344434345414242434243
Window papers (baseline)7,4757,5887,6548,0878,2858,6748,9759,51810,11310,82211,80812,97114,26715,53916,90717,88018,73718,99818,76918,13417,89818,80519,86920,40620,46820,952
Median OJR0.6200.69110.6230.850.8260.770.810.890.820.910.8280.8800.8790.720.69080.6570.540.570.650.530.6550.640.700.630.610.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.