OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Pharmaceutical Science journal rankings 2015

43 ranked journals · Subfield in Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Pharmaceutical Science has 43 ranked journals in 2015. The median journal has an OJR of 0.66, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.03 on 2014; Q1 starts at OJR 1.01. The top three are Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, and Journal of Drug Delivery.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

43
61% of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.66-0.03 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

35%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,940
Median positive listed APC: $3,940 among 12 journals. 31 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (4)

43 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pharmaceutical Science ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
1Expert Opinion on Drug DeliveryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.39Q15.09 0.01 up from 201444526%—
2.33Q15.97 0.35 down from 2014445%—
3Journal of Drug DeliveryHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
2.06Q15.52 0.59 up from 20148192%—
1.88Q14.16 0.07 down from 201477722%$4,210
5International Journal of PharmaceuticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.77Q14.24 0.07 up from 20142,24518%$4,650
6European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.76Q13.70 0.02 down from 201482215%$3,070
7Pharmaceutical ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.56Q13.63 0.20 down from 201489637%$4,690
8ISRN PharmaceuticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
1.33Q11.61 1.03 down from 201458——
9AAPS PharmSciTechSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.06Q12.10 0.04 up from 201451498%$4,190
10Therapeutic DeliveryFuture Science Ltd · United Kingdom
1.03Q12.34 0.34 down from 201435127%—
11Journal of Pharmaceutical InnovationSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.01Q12.08 0.70 up from 20148710%$3,990
12Drug DeliveryOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.90Q22.37 0.17 up from 201441799%$2,864
13Journal of Fluorine ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.88Q22.19 0.01 down from 201469712%$3,660
14Journal of MicroencapsulationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.86Q21.61 0.17 down from 20142639%—
15Drug Delivery and Translational ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.84Q22.26 0.70 up from 201415935%$4,690
16Current Drug DeliveryBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.82Q21.51 0.42 down from 20142083%—
17Scientia PharmaceuticaOAÖsterreichische Apotheker-Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H. · Switzerland
0.80Q21.38 0.26 down from 2014200100%$1,207
18Recent Patents on NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.76Q20.82 0.91 down from 2014718%—
19Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & FormulationBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.75Q21.33 0.19 up from 2014800%—
20Drug Development and Industrial PharmacyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.72Q22.08 0.46 up from 201466512%—
21Assay and Drug Development TechnologiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.71Q21.75 0.29 up from 201413336%—
0.66Q20.72 0.51 down from 2014129100%—
23Pharmaceutical Development and TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q31.26 0.03 down from 20143818%—
24Journal of PharmaceuticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.56Q31.27 0.32 up from 201465100%—
25Journal of Molecular Pharmaceutics & Organic Process ResearchOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.54Q31.26 0.37 up from 201438100%—
26Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of São Paulo · Brazil
0.42Q30.78 0.22 up from 2014320100%—
27Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationSpringer Science+Business Media · South Korea
0.40Q31.09 0.04 up from 20141662%$3,890
0.36Q30.44 0.13 down from 201410787%—
0.34Q30.93 0.36 up from 201424913%$3,810
0.30Q30.74 0.03 up from 201433——
31Current Drug TherapyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.30Q30.70 0.34 up from 2014776%—
32Drug Delivery LettersBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.29Q30.87 0.18 up from 20141120%—
0.29Q30.43 0.15 up from 201472100%—
34Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsOASociety of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats · India
0.21Q40.35 0.19 down from 2014548100%—
0.21Q40.50 0.10 up from 2014580%—
36Pharmaceutical NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.21Q40.49 0.06 up from 2014595%—
0.19Q40.15 0.21 down from 201449100%—
0.18Q40.33 0.05 down from 20141120%—
39Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and ResearchAssociation of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India · India
0.16Q40.28 0.26 down from 201415996%—
0.15Q40.31 0.46 down from 2014716100%—
0.10Q40.16 0.15 down from 20141050%—
0.05Q40.10 0.04 up from 201467——
43PharmatutorOAIndia
0.03Q40.10 0.04 up from 20141570%—

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

21 additional Pharmaceutical Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
43
Window papers (baseline)
17,880 +25.3% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
0.657 -25.3% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1316161616181920202223273136414344434345414242434243
Window papers (baseline)7,4757,5887,6548,0878,2858,6748,9759,51810,11310,82211,80812,97114,26715,53916,90717,88018,73718,99818,76918,13417,89818,80519,86920,40620,46820,952
Median OJR0.6200.69110.6230.850.8260.770.810.890.820.910.8280.8800.8790.720.69080.6570.540.570.650.530.6550.640.700.630.610.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.