OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Pharmaceutical Science journal rankings 2017

43 ranked journals · Subfield in Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Pharmaceutical Science has 43 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 0.57, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 0.99. The top three are Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

43
61% of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.57+0.03 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

35%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,940
Median positive listed APC: $3,940 among 12 journals. 31 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (4)

43 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pharmaceutical Science ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1Expert Opinion on Drug DeliveryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.15Q14.75 0.60 down from 201648032%—
1.96Q14.84 0.23 up from 201686324%$4,210
3International Journal of PharmaceuticsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.57Q14.05 0.09 up from 20162,52726%$4,650
4European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.54Q13.71 0.21 up from 201693525%$3,070
5Pharmaceutical ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.45Q13.74 0.29 up from 201678438%$4,690
6Drug Delivery and Translational ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.28Q13.27 0.26 up from 201615726%$4,690
7Drug DeliveryOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.28Q13.88 1.36 up from 2016475100%$2,864
1.23Q12.79 0.39 up from 2016458%—
9Assay and Drug Development TechnologiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.09Q11.82 0.66 down from 201617230%—
10Journal of Pharmaceutical InnovationSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.07Q12.38 0.14 up from 20169721%$3,990
11AAPS PharmSciTechSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.99Q12.19 0.08 down from 201662013%$4,190
12Journal of MicroencapsulationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.90Q22.12 0.33 up from 20162307%—
13Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationSpringer Science+Business Media · South Korea
0.89Q22.83 1.85 up from 201618013%$3,890
14Journal of PharmaceuticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.89Q20.74 1.30 down from 201644100%—
15Journal of Drug DeliveryHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.89Q21.58 1.20 down from 201646100%—
16Drug Development and Industrial PharmacyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.88Q22.08 0.09 up from 201651617%—
17Therapeutic DeliveryFuture Science Ltd · United Kingdom
0.82Q22.32 0.16 up from 201628540%—
0.81Q22.40 0.98 up from 201640510%$3,810
19Journal of Fluorine ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.78Q21.90 0.34 down from 201670914%$3,660
20Current Drug DeliveryBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.72Q21.61 0.18 down from 20163596%—
21Pharmaceutical Development and TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.72Q21.65 0.06 up from 201634224%—
22Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & FormulationBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.57Q20.92 0.19 down from 2016750%—
23Recent Patents on NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.48Q30.97 0.23 up from 2016883%—
24Scientia PharmaceuticaOAÖsterreichische Apotheker-Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H. · Switzerland
0.43Q30.93 0.11 down from 2016166100%$1,207
25Journal of Molecular Pharmaceutics & Organic Process ResearchOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.36Q30.70 0.33 down from 201640100%—
0.35Q30.66 0.24 up from 201674100%—
0.34Q30.40 0.20 up from 201660——
0.32Q30.73 0.31 up from 20162,178100%—
29Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of São Paulo · Brazil
0.30Q30.50 0.03 down from 2016317100%—
30Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and ResearchAssociation of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India · India
0.29Q30.62 0.20 up from 2016231100%—
0.29Q30.54 0.01 down from 20169884%—
32Current Drug TherapyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.26Q30.68 0.33 up from 2016670%—
33ADMET & DMPKOAInternational Association of Physical Chemists (IAPC) · Croatia
0.26Q30.70 0.06 up from 201670100%—
0.22Q40.35 0.27 down from 2016627%—
35Drug Delivery LettersBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.21Q40.44 0.19 down from 2016554%—
0.20Q40.46 0.19 up from 201646100%—
37Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAGalenos Yayinevi · Türkiye
0.17Q40.39 0.24 up from 201660100%—
0.16Q40.39 0.16 up from 201698100%—
0.15Q40.33 0.31 down from 201632100%—
40Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsOASociety of Pharmaceutical Tecnocrats · India
0.14Q40.59 0.33 up from 2016359100%—
41Pharmaceutical NanotechnologyBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.11Q40.19 0.24 down from 2016794%—
0.03Q40.05 0.13 down from 2016145——
43PharmatutorOAIndia
0.03Q40.12 0.03 down from 2016254100%—

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

23 additional Pharmaceutical Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
43
Window papers (baseline)
18,998 +12.4% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.57 -18.0% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1316161616181920202223273136414344434345414242434243
Window papers (baseline)7,4757,5887,6548,0878,2858,6748,9759,51810,11310,82211,80812,97114,26715,53916,90717,88018,73718,99818,76918,13417,89818,80519,86920,40620,46820,952
Median OJR0.6200.69110.6230.850.8260.770.810.890.820.910.8280.8800.8790.720.69080.6570.540.570.650.530.6550.640.700.630.610.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.