OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journal rankings 2015

37 ranked journals · Subfield in Physics and Astronomy

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics has 37 ranked journals in 2015. The median OJR rose 0.14 on 2014 to 1.08, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.55. The top three are Journal of Complex Networks, SIAM Review, and Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

37
11% of Physics and Astronomy
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.08+0.14 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

19%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 21 journals. 16 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Physics and Astronomy (8)

37 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
1Journal of Complex NetworksOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.04Q14.13 0.41 up from 20146848%$4,533
2SIAM ReviewSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
2.93Q13.25 0.70 up from 201410830%—
2.40Q12.84 0.28 down from 20141,17419%$3,710
4Nonlinear DynamicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.35Q13.34 0.33 down from 20141,54110%$4,790
5Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.84Q12.05 0.61 down from 201411358%$3,290
6Network ScienceCambridge University Press · United States
1.74Q11.92 0.50 down from 20145065%$3,550
1.68Q12.46 0.07 down from 201463071%—
8Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SimulationOAUniversity of Surrey · United Kingdom
1.65Q11.60 0.27 up from 2014204100%$1,300
9Applied Mathematics LettersElsevier BV · United States
1.59Q11.99 0.19 up from 2014703100%$3,800
10Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceAmerican Institute of Physics · United States
1.55Q12.40 0.22 down from 201463441%—
11Internet MathematicsOATaylor & Francis · United States
1.50Q21.57 0.84 down from 20146396%—
12Physica D Nonlinear PhenomenaElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.49Q21.98no change41260%$3,640
1.39Q22.24 0.20 up from 20142,14627%$3,550
14SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical SystemsSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
1.33Q22.19 0.05 up from 201418935%—
15Regular and Chaotic DynamicsPleiades Publishing · Russia
1.30Q22.74 1.51 up from 201414622%—
16Chaos Solitons & FractalsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.24Q21.80 0.09 up from 201448224%$3,970
17Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and ExperimentInstitute of Physics · United Kingdom
1.19Q22.03 0.38 down from 201486788%$3,290
18International Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosWorld Scientific · Singapore
1.13Q21.82 0.35 up from 201482217%—
19Wave MotionElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.08Q21.61 0.15 up from 201426425%$3,640
20International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and ApplicationOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.95Q31.23 0.17 down from 201484100%—
21Studies in Applied MathematicsWiley · United States
0.93Q31.03 0.13 down from 201411929%$4,550
22Results in PhysicsOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.89Q31.83 0.61 up from 2014138100%$1,920
23European Journal of Applied MathematicsOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.88Q31.04 0.27 up from 201413244%$3,550
24Advances in Complex SystemsWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.84Q30.74 0.25 down from 201428013%—
25Reports on Mathematical PhysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.83Q31.02 0.24 down from 201415534%$3,000
26Advances in Mathematical PhysicsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.80Q31.19 0.20 down from 2014200100%$2,830
27International Journal of Modern Physics CWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.70Q31.09 0.05 down from 201444118%—
0.69Q31.76 0.69 up from 20146115%$2,712
29American Journal of PhysicsAmerican Institute of Physics · United States
0.65Q41.09 0.13 down from 201450451%—
30Theoretical and Mathematical PhysicsPleiades Publishing · Germany
0.53Q41.01 0.13 up from 201438827%—
31Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical PhysicsSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.46Q40.68 0.13 down from 2014125100%$1,490
32European Journal of PhysicsIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
0.35Q40.66 0.17 down from 201450560%$3,325
0.33Q40.75 0.01 down from 20141554%—
34Journal of Applied Mathematics and PhysicsOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.25Q40.33 0.04 up from 2014242100%—
35Physics EducationIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
0.19Q40.36 0.02 up from 201441741%$3,325
36The Physics TeacherAmerican Association of Physics Teachers · United States
0.17Q40.31 0.01 down from 20149905%—
0.16Q40.08 0.16 down from 2014620%—

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
37
Window papers (baseline)
35,268 +12.2% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
1.08 +21.3% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2830313030313130303130333434363739434345434544474849
Window papers (baseline)17,20017,92218,79320,16021,24122,29424,06125,93627,66128,61829,35530,33531,43032,38333,84035,26836,05135,94135,72636,68138,08039,59341,29442,13942,54443,309
Median OJR0.7210.700.950.96370.921.020.9760.9801.101.091.271.140.890.96400.941.080.971.0020.930.820.880.710.7170.680.640.67

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.