Journal rankings · indicator year 2000
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2000
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journal rankings 2000
28 ranked journals · Subfield in Physics and Astronomy
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics has 28 ranked journals in 2000. The median journal has an OJR of 0.72, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.13. The top three are SIAM Review, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, and Journal of Nonlinear Science.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Physics and Astronomy (8)
28 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1SIAM ReviewSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States | 2.60Q1 | 1.61no 1999 value | 156 | 7% | — | — | |
2Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceAmerican Institute of Physics · United States | 2.24Q1 | 2.22no 1999 value | 259 | 12% | — | — | |
3Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States | 1.61Q1 | 1.21no 1999 value | 65 | 12% | $3,290 | — | |
4Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesRoyal Society · United Kingdom | 1.53Q1 | 1.33no 1999 value | 569 | 15% | — | — | |
5Physica D Nonlinear PhenomenaElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.52Q1 | 1.61no 1999 value | 907 | 18% | $3,640 | — | |
6Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsAmerican Physical Society · United States | 1.32Q1 | 2.02no 1999 value | 5,721 | 39% | — | — | |
7Dynamics and Stability of SystemsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 1.13Q1 | 0.94no 1999 value | 49 | 0% | — | — | |
8Nonlinear DynamicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.09Q2 | 0.82no 1999 value | 192 | 7% | $4,790 | — | |
9European Journal of Applied MathematicsOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.97Q2 | 0.66no 1999 value | 100 | 9% | $3,550 | — | |
10Studies in Applied MathematicsWiley · United States | 0.91Q2 | 0.61no 1999 value | 92 | 16% | $4,550 | — | |
11Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.85Q2 | 1.19no 1999 value | 1,873 | 29% | $3,550 | — | |
12Advances in Complex SystemsWorld Scientific · Singapore | 0.77Q2 | 0.73no 1999 value | 44 | 13% | — | — | |
13International Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosWorld Scientific · Singapore | 0.75Q2 | 0.79no 1999 value | 595 | 5% | — | — | |
14International Journal of Modern Physics CWorld Scientific · Singapore | 0.74Q2 | 0.89no 1999 value | 376 | 17% | — | — | |
15Wave MotionElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.70Q3 | 0.61no 1999 value | 147 | 15% | $3,640 | — | |
16Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & MaterialsWorld Scientific · Singapore | 0.68Q3 | 0.70no 1999 value | 118 | 4% | — | — | |
17American Journal of PhysicsAmerican Institute of Physics · United States | 0.64Q3 | 0.78no 1999 value | 844 | 13% | — | — | |
18Applied Mathematics LettersElsevier BV · United States | 0.64Q3 | 0.49no 1999 value | 459 | 100% | $3,800 | — | |
19Reports on Mathematical PhysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.62Q3 | 0.73no 1999 value | 227 | 24% | $3,000 | — | |
20Journal of Non-Equilibrium ThermodynamicsDe Gruyter · Germany | 0.57Q3 | 0.49no 1999 value | 83 | 0% | $2,712 | — | |
21Chaos Solitons & FractalsElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 0.52Q3 | 0.68no 1999 value | 498 | 7% | $3,970 | — | |
22Theoretical and Mathematical PhysicsPleiades Publishing · Germany | 0.25Q4 | 0.43no 1999 value | 417 | 16% | — | — | |
23FormaOAJapan | 0.23Q4 | 0.20no 1999 value | 72 | 0% | — | — | |
24European Journal of PhysicsIOP Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.22Q4 | 0.33no 1999 value | 301 | 47% | $3,325 | — | |
25Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical PhysicsSpringer Nature · United Kingdom | 0.20Q4 | 0.17no 1999 value | 129 | 100% | $1,490 | — | |
26Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical SimulationElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 0.18Q4 | 0.11no 1999 value | 182 | 0% | $3,710 | — | |
27Physics EducationIOP Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.11Q4 | 0.09no 1999 value | 451 | 20% | $3,325 | — | |
28The Physics TeacherAmerican Association of Physics Teachers · United States | 0.09Q4 | 0.06no 1999 value | 807 | 1% | — | — |
Subfields of Physics and Astronomy, with Statistical and Nonlinear Physics highlighted.
- Astronomy and Astrophysics62
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics57
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics53
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics28
- Radiation15
- Condensed Matter Physics5
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics0
- Instrumentation0
Journals
Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
6 additional Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 28
- Window papers (baseline)
- 17,200 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
- Median OJR
- 0.721 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
- Rising journals (2025)
- 4
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 28 | 30 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 30 | 33 | 34 | 34 | 36 | 37 | 39 | 43 | 43 | 45 | 43 | 45 | 44 | 47 | 48 | 49 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 17,200 | 17,922 | 18,793 | 20,160 | 21,241 | 22,294 | 24,061 | 25,936 | 27,661 | 28,618 | 29,355 | 30,335 | 31,430 | 32,383 | 33,840 | 35,268 | 36,051 | 35,941 | 35,726 | 36,681 | 38,080 | 39,593 | 41,294 | 42,139 | 42,544 | 43,309 | |
| Median OJR | 0.721 | 0.70 | 0.95 | 0.9637 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 0.976 | 0.980 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.27 | 1.14 | 0.89 | 0.9640 | 0.94 | 1.08 | 0.97 | 1.002 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.717 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.