OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journal rankings 2016

39 ranked journals · Subfield in Physics and Astronomy

Statistical and Nonlinear Physics has 39 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.11 on 2015 to 0.97, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.49. The top three are SIAM Review, Journal of Complex Networks, and Nonlinear Dynamics.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

39
12% of Physics and Astronomy
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.97-0.11 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

23%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,438
Median positive listed APC: $3,438 among 22 journals. 17 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Physics and Astronomy (8)

39 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1SIAM ReviewSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
3.15Q14.16 0.91 up from 201510636%—
2Journal of Complex NetworksOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.61Q14.14 0.01 up from 201510157%$4,533
3Nonlinear DynamicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.36Q13.91 0.57 up from 20151,8349%$4,790
2.12Q13.01 0.17 up from 20151,10325%$3,710
5Applied Mathematics LettersElsevier BV · United States
1.93Q12.44 0.46 up from 201560999%$3,800
6Network ScienceCambridge University Press · United States
1.82Q11.71 0.21 down from 20158372%$3,550
7Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.70Q12.33 0.28 up from 201511965%$3,290
1.64Q12.56 0.10 up from 201572894%—
9Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SimulationOAUniversity of Surrey · United Kingdom
1.61Q11.44 0.17 down from 2015239100%$1,300
10Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceAmerican Institute of Physics · United States
1.49Q12.58 0.17 up from 201568645%—
1.37Q22.47 0.23 up from 20152,50430%$3,550
12Chaos Solitons & FractalsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.32Q21.82 0.02 up from 201565018%$3,970
13Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering SciencesOASpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.27Q21.85 0.09 up from 201548100%$1,890
14Regular and Chaotic DynamicsPleiades Publishing · Russia
1.25Q22.18 0.57 down from 201514731%—
15SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical SystemsSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
1.19Q22.01 0.18 down from 201519551%—
16Physica D Nonlinear PhenomenaElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.16Q21.65 0.33 down from 201541369%$3,640
17Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and ExperimentInstitute of Physics · United Kingdom
1.16Q22.16 0.13 up from 201589987%$3,290
18Studies in Applied MathematicsWiley · United States
1.06Q22.00 0.97 up from 201512840%$4,550
19Wave MotionElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.06Q21.68 0.07 up from 201528733%$3,640
20International Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.97Q21.57 0.26 down from 201573520%—
21Internet MathematicsOATaylor & Francis · United States
0.96Q31.55 0.02 down from 20156791%—
22Reports on Mathematical PhysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.73Q30.82 0.20 down from 201514950%$3,000
23Results in PhysicsOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.72Q31.24 0.59 down from 2015173100%$1,920
24Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical PhysicsSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.71Q31.23 0.55 up from 2015115100%$1,490
25European Journal of Applied MathematicsOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.70Q30.72 0.32 down from 201515362%$3,550
26International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and ApplicationOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.68Q30.56 0.67 down from 201583100%—
27International Journal of Modern Physics CWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.66Q31.11 0.01 up from 201545523%—
0.61Q31.87 0.12 up from 20156531%$2,712
29Advances in Mathematical PhysicsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.60Q30.85 0.34 down from 2015292100%$2,830
30Theoretical and Mathematical PhysicsPleiades Publishing · Germany
0.58Q31.06 0.05 up from 201537439%—
31American Journal of PhysicsAmerican Institute of Physics · United States
0.58Q41.00 0.09 down from 201550947%—
32Advances in Complex SystemsWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.55Q40.72 0.03 down from 201523514%—
33Journal of Nonlinear DynamicsHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
0.51Q40.63no change32100%—
34European Journal of PhysicsIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
0.34Q40.66no change54458%$3,325
0.32Q41.09 0.34 up from 20151539%—
36Journal of Applied Mathematics and PhysicsOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.25Q40.38 0.05 up from 2015438100%—
37Physics EducationIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
0.21Q40.49 0.13 up from 201540148%$3,325
38The Physics TeacherAmerican Association of Physics Teachers · United States
0.17Q40.28 0.02 down from 20159215%—
39FormaOAJapan
0.16Q40.24 0.02 down from 201546100%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

14 additional Statistical and Nonlinear Physics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
39
Window papers (baseline)
36,051 +11.3% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.97 +0.9% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2830313030313130303130333434363739434345434544474849
Window papers (baseline)17,20017,92218,79320,16021,24122,29424,06125,93627,66128,61829,35530,33531,43032,38333,84035,26836,05135,94135,72636,68138,08039,59341,29442,13942,54443,309
Median OJR0.7210.700.950.96370.921.020.9760.9801.101.091.271.140.890.96400.941.080.971.0020.930.820.880.710.7170.680.640.67

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.