OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2016

Physics and Astronomy journal rankings 2016

334 ranked journals · Field in Physical Sciences

Physics and Astronomy has 334 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.05 on 2015 to 0.66, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.18. The top three are Reviews of Modern Physics, Advances in Optics and Photonics, and Physics Reports.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

334
5% of Physical Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.66-0.05 vs 2015
This fieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

28%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,214
Median positive listed APC: $3,214 among 168 journals. Another 4 list $0; 162 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields in Physics and Astronomy (8)

Up to Physical Sciences

334 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Physics and Astronomy ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Reviews of Modern PhysicsAmerican Physical Society · United States
18.85Q139.41 2.38 up from 201511974%—
2Advances in Optics and PhotonicsOptica Publishing Group · United States
9.28Q120.81 6.05 up from 20153631%—
3Physics ReportsElsevier BV · Netherlands
9.07Q119.03 1.13 up from 201515379%$6,240
4Nature PhotonicsNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
8.22Q116.95 1.94 up from 201593933%$12,690
5Reports on Progress in PhysicsIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
8.08Q117.24 0.79 down from 201516378%$4,680
6The Astronomy and Astrophysics ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
7.26Q111.32 2.46 down from 20153182%$5,290
7Light Science & ApplicationsOASpringer Nature · United Kingdom
6.52Q114.72 1.86 down from 2015167100%$4,190
8The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesOAInstitute of Physics · United Kingdom
5.90Q110.49 1.65 down from 201554998%$4,499
5.62Q19.36 1.75 down from 20158132%$5,230
10Nature PhysicsNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.14Q110.61 2.42 up from 20151,02048%$12,690
11Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.57Q112.39 1.51 up from 20156573%$4,780
12Physical Review XOAAmerican Physical Society · United States
4.35Q19.72 3.18 up from 2015497100%$4,200
13Space Science ReviewsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
4.27Q17.62 0.55 up from 201525863%$5,290
14OpticaOAOptica Publishing Group · United States
4.06Q18.78 1.02 up from 2015259100%$3,208
15Physical Review LettersAmerican Physical Society · United States
3.80Q18.90 0.83 up from 20159,36685%$3,750
16Progress in Surface ScienceElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.60Q19.33 1.43 up from 20153414%$4,130
17Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryMineralogical Society of America · United States
3.59Q14.83 1.62 down from 2015111——
18SIAM ReviewSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
3.15Q14.16 0.91 up from 201510636%—
19The Astrophysical Journal LettersOAIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
3.01Q16.50 0.42 up from 20151,942100%$2,400
20Publications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificInstitute of Physics · United Kingdom
2.95Q14.70 0.08 down from 2015317100%$3,325
21Publications of the Astronomical Society of AustraliaCambridge University Press · Australia
2.75Q15.39 1.38 up from 201514998%$3,550
22Physics of the Dark UniverseElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.66Q15.81 0.42 up from 20157184%$3,660
23Journal of Complex NetworksOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.61Q14.14 0.01 up from 201510157%$4,533
24Annual Review of Astronomy and AstrophysicsAnnual Reviews · United States
2.44Q137.77 3.19 down from 20154481%—
25Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.39Q15.07 0.23 up from 201555897%$1,451
26International Reviews in Physical ChemistryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.38Q15.34 0.79 down from 20154515%—
27Nonlinear DynamicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.36Q13.91 0.57 up from 20151,8349%$4,790
28Physical Review AppliedAmerican Physical Society · United States
2.32Q15.18 0.58 up from 201532361%—
29Computer Physics CommunicationsElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.29Q14.37 0.56 up from 201589454%$4,160
30Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationAmerican Chemical Society · United States
2.19Q15.67 0.13 up from 20151,61436%$4,500
31The Astrophysical JournalOAIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
2.18Q16.25 0.03 up from 20158,67299%$4,499
32The European Physical Journal COASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.16Q16.00 0.62 up from 20151,576100%$0 listed
2.12Q13.01 0.17 up from 20151,10325%$3,710
34Physics Letters BOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.07Q15.28 0.10 up from 20152,534100%$0 listed
35The Astronomical JournalOAInstitute of Physics · United States
2.05Q14.34 0.17 down from 20151,01799%$4,499
2.00Q14.84 0.15 up from 201510,168——
37Chinese Physics CIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
2.00Q15.31 1.40 up from 201571956%$2,410
38Astronomy and AstrophysicsOAEDP Sciences · France
1.98Q15.60 0.26 up from 20155,411100%$1,865
39Applied Mathematics LettersElsevier BV · United States
1.93Q12.44 0.46 up from 201560999%$3,800
40Journal of High Energy AstrophysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.93Q13.87 3.73 down from 201545100%$2,520
41Photonics ResearchOptica Publishing Group · United States
1.91Q14.73 0.93 up from 20151724%—
1.91Q13.97 0.06 down from 2015105100%$1,413
1.86Q14.45 0.02 up from 201540474%$4,070
44New Journal of PhysicsOAIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
1.83Q13.94 0.11 up from 20152,648100%$2,610
45Network ScienceCambridge University Press · United States
1.82Q11.71 0.21 down from 20158372%$3,550
46Physical Review BAmerican Physical Society · United States
1.81Q14.10 0.11 up from 201514,6510%$2,675
47Earth and Space ScienceOAAmerican Geophysical Union · United States
1.79Q12.86 0.19 up from 201542100%$2,650
48Astroparticle PhysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.76Q14.48 1.11 up from 201529787%$2,920
1.75Q13.29 0.02 up from 20156258%—
50Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.70Q12.33 0.28 up from 201511965%$3,290

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

88 additional Physics and Astronomy journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
334
Window papers (baseline)
379,807 +4.8% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.662 +4.5% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
36Comparison-group list (36)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals220234232241243250252261269273276291303310321324334343348367380379368368361358
Window papers (baseline)239,411246,506254,602264,968276,497287,864301,824318,045328,993337,594340,171347,983354,503362,347368,160376,730379,807383,796380,664378,685375,462371,519367,990360,929353,510350,521
Median OJR0.583400.560.570.583380.6020.6270.670.6830.6430.6810.690.6480.6530.6340.6750.710.6620.6600.6310.6140.6400.6130.590.6520.6000.62
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 6.4%293 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.285 per 1,000278 journals
Output growthMedian: +0.6%326 journals
Open access shareMedian: 73.4%358 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,000213 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 30.1%348 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.0%358 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.61352 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 38.3%358 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 48.2%356 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.