OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2007

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2007

Communication journal rankings 2007

38 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Communication has 38 ranked journals in 2007. The median OJR rose 0.09 on 2006 to 1.66, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.19. The top three are Journal of Knowledge Management, Political Communication, and Journal of Communication.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2007. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2004–2006, the window the 2007 score is computed on.

38
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.66+0.09 vs 2006
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

16%
All fields: 16%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 13 journals. 25 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

38 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Communication ranking, 2007

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2006. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2004–2006, the window the 2007 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2004–2006 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2007.

Compare
1Journal of Knowledge ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
4.73Q12.57 0.12 up from 20061847%—
2Political CommunicationTaylor & Francis · United States
3.84Q11.61 0.38 up from 20061113%—
3Journal of CommunicationOxford University Press · United States
3.38Q11.78 0.40 up from 20062571%$4,235
4Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsSAGE Publishing · United States
3.09Q11.25 0.45 up from 2006850%—
5Gazette (Leiden Netherlands)SAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.88Q11.38 0.63 up from 200670——
6Journal of Studies in International EducationSAGE Publishing · United States
2.80Q11.38 0.18 up from 20066213%$3,650
7Communication TheoryWiley · United States
2.76Q11.74 0.46 up from 20061110%$4,235
8JournalismSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.71Q11.37 0.22 up from 2006723%$3,900
9Journalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySAGE Publishing · United States
2.67Q10.74 0.15 down from 20062641%$3,900
10Journalism StudiesRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.19Q10.99 0.18 up from 20061357%—
11Journal of Public Relations ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
2.04Q21.90 0.65 up from 2006543%—
12CommunicationsDe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
2.03Q20.62 0.11 up from 20067124%$2,712
13Global Media and CommunicationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.00Q20.69 0.40 up from 20065812%$3,650
1.85Q21.91 0.62 up from 2006340%$3,368
15Journal of Business CommunicationSAGE Publishing · United States
1.82Q20.83 0.12 down from 2006870%—
16International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.80Q20.86 0.61 down from 20065524%$3,650
17Journal of Communication ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.80Q20.72 0.58 down from 2006767%—
18e-Service JournalIndiana University Press · United States
1.72Q20.68 0.02 up from 2006460%—
19International Journal of Knowledge ManagementOAIGI Global · United States
1.69Q21.14 0.52 up from 2006370%—
20Knowledge Management Research & PracticeTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.64Q31.33 0.18 up from 20069021%—
21Cross Cultural Management An International JournalEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.49Q30.83 0.10 up from 2006694%—
22Corporate Communications An International JournalEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.40Q30.93 0.08 up from 2006866%—
23Public Relations ReviewElsevier BV · United States
1.16Q30.62 0.13 down from 20062421%$4,310
24Journal of Mass Media EthicsTaylor & Francis · United States
1.04Q30.50 0.15 up from 2006835%—
25Asian Journal of CommunicationRoutledge · United Kingdom
0.99Q30.68no change600%—
26Newspaper Research JournalSAGE Publishing · United States
0.83Q30.27 0.28 down from 2006917%$3,200
27Media International AustraliaPublisher not listed
0.65Q30.21 0.02 down from 20061667%$3,650
28Nordicom review/NORDICOM reviewOADe Gruyter Open · Sweden
0.63Q30.30 0.22 up from 200679100%—
29Journal of Political MarketingTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q30.38 0.04 up from 2006510%—
0.41Q40.29 0.14 up from 200643100%—
31CommunicatioRoutledge · United Kingdom
0.33Q40.28 0.25 up from 2006500%—
32El Profesional de la InformacionOAEdiciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL · Spain
0.25Q40.24 0.01 down from 2006211100%—
33Journal of Radio StudiesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.22Q40.19 0.05 up from 2006650%—
34Ecquid Novi African Journalism StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.16Q40.12 0.04 up from 20061590%—
35Journal of Teaching in International BusinessTaylor & Francis · United States
0.14Q40.39 0.06 down from 2006510%—
36Comunicação e SociedadeOAUniversity of Minho · Portugal
0.11Q40.05 0.04 down from 2006100100%—
37Journal of International CommunicationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.05Q40.02 0.01 down from 20062700%—
38Communication & SocietyOAUniversity of Navarre · Spain
0.00Q40.00no change107100%$301

Citations made in 2007. Corpus-wide, 72.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

25 additional Communication journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2004–2006, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2007. Publication window: 2004–2006. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
38
Window papers (baseline)
14,308 +44.6% from indicator year 2004
Median OJR
1.66 +76.5% from indicator year 2004
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2004–2006 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2830323635353838434852525457666568717474797577737271
Window papers (baseline)6,6257,3538,0609,0409,89311,13212,59814,30816,13018,16520,33322,52525,15027,54129,41931,11532,40433,28433,56534,50636,32739,97343,46644,32443,34842,854
Median OJR0.6920.540.6910.670.941.311.5701.661.471.861.801.851.671.721.491.741.561.591.541.3331.421.3261.481.621.681.565

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.