Journal rankings · indicator year 2012
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2012
Conservation journal rankings 2012
16 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities
Conservation has 16 ranked journals in 2012. The median OJR rose 0.17 on 2011 to 0.81, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.96. The top three are The American Archivist, Art Therapy, and Records Management Journal.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2012. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)
16 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2011. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2009–2011 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2003 to 2012. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1The American ArchivistSociety of American Archivists · United States | 3.08Q1 | 0.81 0.09 down from 2011 | 81 | 15% | — | ||
2Art TherapyTaylor & Francis · United States | 2.21Q1 | 1.00 0.55 up from 2011 | 107 | 2% | — | ||
3Records Management JournalEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 2.09Q1 | 0.80 0.21 up from 2011 | 91 | 0% | — | ||
4Arts & HealthTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 1.96Q1 | 1.31 1.28 down from 2011 | 45 | 18% | — | ||
5Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalWiley · United States | 1.92Q2 | 1.62 1.14 up from 2011 | 106 | 5% | $2,900 | ||
6Journal of Applied Arts and HealthIntellect · United Kingdom | 1.31Q2 | 0.85 0.08 up from 2011 | 40 | 13% | — | ||
7The Arts in PsychotherapyElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.18Q2 | 0.96 0.12 down from 2011 | 159 | 7% | $3,500 | ||
8Art Documentation Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North AmericaArt Libraries Society of North America · United States | 0.95Q2 | 0.30 0.18 up from 2011 | 64 | 0% | — | ||
9Journal of Interior DesignSAGE Publishing · United States | 0.68Q3 | 0.44 0.06 down from 2011 | 52 | 0% | $3,650 | ||
10Archiving ConferenceOAUnited States | 0.55Q3 | 0.16no change | 113 | 96% | — | ||
11iPRESPublisher not listed | 0.50Q3 | 0.25 0.32 down from 2011 | 53 | 0% | — | ||
12ArchivariaAssociation of Canadian Archivists · Canada | 0.42Q3 | 0.23 0.09 up from 2011 | 88 | 56% | — | ||
13Journal of Family & Consumer SciencesAmerican Association of Family and Consumer Sciences · United States | 0.19Q4 | 0.05 0.15 down from 2011 | 82 | 0% | — | ||
14Canadian Art Therapy Association JournalTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.09Q4 | 0.00 0.05 down from 2011 | 32 | 0% | — | ||
15CommaLiverpool University Press · United Kingdom | 0.08Q4 | 0.05 0.03 up from 2011 | 101 | 3% | — | ||
16DramatherapyOASAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.00Q4 | 0.00 0.22 down from 2011 | 38 | 6% | $3,200 |
Subfields of Arts and Humanities, with Conservation highlighted.
- Language and Linguistics107
- Philosophy71
- Archeology49
- Literature and Literary Theory43
- History and Philosophy of Science26
- Music24
- Conservation16
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts16
- Museology15
- History9
- Religious studies1
- Classics0
- General Arts and Humanities0
Journals
Citations made in 2012. Corpus-wide, 75.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
6 additional Conservation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2009–2011, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2012. Publication window: 2009–2011. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 16
- Window papers (baseline)
- 10,662 +16.4% from indicator year 2009
- Median OJR
- 0.813 +48.7% from indicator year 2009
- Rising journals (2025)
- 0
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2009–2011 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 23 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 6,119 | 6,434 | 6,797 | 7,260 | 7,368 | 7,777 | 7,899 | 8,297 | 8,570 | 9,163 | 9,633 | 10,107 | 10,662 | 11,207 | 11,584 | 12,060 | 12,999 | 13,909 | 15,201 | 15,916 | 16,923 | 16,930 | 17,196 | 15,960 | 16,062 | 17,153 | |
| Median OJR | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.740 | 0.65 | 0.813 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.806 | 0.744 | 0.85 | 0.7191 | 0.7189 | 0.82 | 0.58 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.