OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2019

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2019

Conservation journal rankings 2019

23 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities

Conservation has 23 ranked journals in 2019. The median OJR rose 0.09 on 2018 to 0.81, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.51. The top three are Records Management Journal, International Journal of Art Therapy, and Art Therapy.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2019. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 score is computed on.

23
5% of Arts and Humanities
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.81+0.09 vs 2018
This subfieldAll 0.82World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

13%
All fields: 34%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,500
Median positive listed APC: $3,500 among 3 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 19 have no known price. All fields: $3,310.

Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)

23 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Conservation ranking, 2019

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2018. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2016–2018 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2010 to 2019.

Compare
1Records Management JournalEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
4.77Q11.78 0.40 down from 20185923%—
2International Journal of Art TherapyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.48Q12.03 1.36 up from 20185535%—
3Art TherapyTaylor & Francis · United States
2.25Q11.12 0.32 up from 201810814%—
4Archives and ManuscriptsAustralian Society of Archivists · Australia
1.77Q10.98 0.53 up from 201811579%—
5The American ArchivistSociety of American Archivists · United States
1.52Q10.51 0.01 down from 2018848%—
6Arts & HealthTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.51Q11.54 0.65 up from 20187239%—
7Archives and RecordsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.37Q20.67 0.05 up from 20188022%—
8The Arts in PsychotherapyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.31Q21.90 0.57 up from 201819926%$3,500
9Canadian Art Therapy Association JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.99Q20.65 0.42 up from 20184129%—
10Collection and CurationEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
0.94Q20.50no 2018 value3414%——
0.86Q20.79 0.26 up from 20181027%$2,900
0.81Q20.39 0.02 down from 20188323%$0 listed
13Journal of Interior DesignSAGE Publishing · United States
0.76Q30.85 0.05 up from 2018588%$3,650
0.72Q30.64 0.10 up from 20187317%—
15ArchivariaAssociation of Canadian Archivists · Canada
0.57Q30.11 0.31 down from 20185557%—
16Art Documentation Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North AmericaArt Libraries Society of North America · United States
0.46Q30.33 0.01 up from 20187417%—
17Archiving ConferenceOAUnited States
0.40Q30.22 0.09 up from 201810810%—
18Journal of Applied Arts and HealthIntellect · United Kingdom
0.33Q30.34no change8229%—
19Journal of Family & Consumer SciencesAmerican Association of Family and Consumer Sciences · United States
0.24Q40.24 0.06 up from 20181610%—
20VIEW Journal of European Television History and CultureOANetherlands Institute for Sound and Vision · Netherlands
0.16Q40.16 0.02 down from 2018103100%—
21CommaLiverpool University Press · United Kingdom
0.15Q40.08 0.03 down from 2018656%—
22Drama Therapy ReviewIntellect · United Kingdom
0.12Q40.03 0.08 down from 2018850%—
23iPRESPublisher not listed
0.10Q40.11 0.02 up from 201864——

Citations made in 2019. Corpus-wide, 83.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

5 additional Conservation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2016–2018, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2019. Publication window: 2016–2018. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
23
Window papers (baseline)
15,916 +22.4% from indicator year 2016
Median OJR
0.806 -8.2% from indicator year 2016
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2016–2018 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1111111111121414141514141619202121212223242323232223
Window papers (baseline)6,1196,4346,7977,2607,3687,7777,8998,2978,5709,1639,63310,10710,66211,20711,58412,06012,99913,90915,20115,91616,92316,93017,19615,96016,06217,153
Median OJR0.350.410.280.300.360.390.270.330.460.550.7400.650.8130.860.870.830.880.790.710.8060.7440.850.71910.71890.820.58

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.