OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Complementary and alternative medicine journal rankings 2017

47 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine has 47 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 0.42, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 0.98. The top three are Integrative Medicine International, Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, and BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

47
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.42-0.01 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

38%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,430
Median positive listed APC: $2,430 among 17 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 29 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

47 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Complementary and alternative medicine ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1Integrative Medicine InternationalOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
9.37Q125.90 8.50 up from 201658100%—
1.84Q12.93 0.68 up from 2016209100%$0 listed
3BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.62Q12.84 0.14 down from 20161,465100%$2,990
4Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.60Q12.58 0.15 up from 201618317%$3,530
5Holistic Nursing PracticeLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.42Q12.43 0.21 up from 20161465%—
1.40Q12.24 0.22 up from 2016199100%$1,200
1.37Q12.15 0.34 down from 20161693%$1,800
8Complementary Therapies in MedicineOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.23Q12.71 0.01 down from 201635819%$2,760
9The Journal of Alternative and Complementary MedicineMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.23Q12.13 0.16 up from 201636123%—
1.17Q11.47 0.39 up from 2016135100%$1,800
11HomeopathyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
1.05Q11.23 0.55 down from 20162049%—
12Acupuncture in MedicineSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.98Q12.08 0.34 up from 201625820%$4,150
13EXPLOREElsevier BV · United States
0.90Q21.33 0.01 up from 20161969%$2,090
0.83Q21.19 0.02 up from 201613798%—
0.75Q20.76 0.31 up from 2016179100%—
16Complementary Medicine ResearchKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.72Q21.11 0.06 up from 201613658%—
17Journal of Dietary SupplementsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.71Q21.92 0.12 up from 201612710%—
18Integrative Medicine ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.66Q21.13 0.16 down from 2016110100%$1,700
0.53Q20.98 0.09 up from 201640100%—
0.53Q21.16 0.07 down from 2016490%—
0.52Q20.88 0.29 down from 201631419%$2,430
22Journal of pharmacopunctureOAKorean Pharmacopuncture Institute · South Korea
0.50Q21.12 0.41 up from 2016115100%—
23Chinese Journal of Integrative MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.48Q20.89 0.13 down from 20165531%$4,190
24Ancient Science of LifeOAMedknow · India
0.42Q20.51 0.19 down from 2016128100%—
25Medical AcupunctureMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.41Q30.55 0.13 up from 201617572%—
0.39Q30.64 0.20 up from 201684100%—
0.37Q30.88 0.17 down from 2016755%$2,340
28Deutsche Zeitschrift für AkupunkturSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.31Q30.25 0.17 down from 20161423%$3,390
0.28Q30.55 0.32 down from 201633100%—
30Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of Karachi · Pakistan
0.27Q30.46no 2016 value291100%——
31Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.23Q30.56no change1058%$4,090
32Chinese MedicineOASpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.23Q30.38 0.22 down from 201671100%—
0.17Q30.24 0.02 down from 201683100%$1,400
0.16Q30.26 0.04 up from 2016430%—
0.16Q30.12 0.23 down from 2016116100%—
36Journal of Natural RemediesOAInformatics Publishing Limited · India
0.14Q30.24 0.02 down from 20164095%—
0.11Q40.07 0.21 down from 2016139——
38Alternative & Integrative MedicineOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.10Q40.12 0.35 down from 20162234%—
39Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.10Q40.35 0.04 up from 20162263%$3,790
40Alternative and Complementary TherapiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.08Q40.11 0.05 down from 20161458%—
41Nanfang huli xuebaoUniverse Scientific Publishing · China
0.04Q40.20 0.09 up from 20161580%—
42Journal of NursingOAUniverse Scientific Publishing · Singapore
0.03Q40.04no change56——
43Zhongguo xunzheng yixue zazhiSichuan University School of Medicine · China
0.02Q40.00 0.05 down from 20162900%—
0.02Q40.02 0.27 down from 2016455%$1,870
45Zhonghua zhongyiyao xuekanChinese Medical Association · China
0.01Q40.03 0.01 up from 20164320%—
0.00Q40.00 0.02 down from 20161250%—
0.00Q40.00no change663——

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

23 additional Complementary and alternative medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
47
Window papers (baseline)
67,381 -20.7% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.42 -22.0% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314161721252726283134363739414243475454515051545958
Window papers (baseline)10,08112,57216,87821,62326,75331,70637,68443,89050,77157,28763,71270,34076,88082,13884,95484,74379,39267,38151,61840,22235,63838,28644,11253,44658,25563,352
Median OJR0.090.16230.3030.3020.170.2560.2420.210.16170.270.31590.310.3900.400.530.590.430.420.2630.250.2380.3910.4080.4070.31650.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.