OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2019

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2019

Complementary and alternative medicine journal rankings 2019

54 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine has 54 ranked journals in 2019. The median journal has an OJR of 0.25, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2018; Q1 starts at OJR 0.86. The top three are Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Integrative Medicine Research.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2019. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 score is computed on.

54
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.25-0.01 vs 2018
This subfieldAll 0.82World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

43%
All fields: 34%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,430
Median positive listed APC: $2,430 among 19 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 34 have no known price. All fields: $3,310.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

54 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Complementary and alternative medicine ranking, 2019

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2018. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2016–2018 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2010 to 2019.

Compare
2.02Q13.63 0.17 up from 2018198100%$0 listed
2BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.61Q13.77 0.57 up from 20181,339100%$2,990
3Integrative Medicine ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.53Q12.91 0.59 up from 2018154100%$1,700
1.42Q12.65 1.01 up from 2018134—$1,200
1.34Q12.91 0.71 up from 20181847%$1,800
6Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative MedicineOASAGE Publishing · United States
1.16Q11.98no 2018 value50100%$2,000—
7Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.15Q12.52 0.16 up from 201832913%$3,530
8Acupuncture in MedicineSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.02Q12.07 0.18 up from 201819037%$4,150
9Complementary Therapies in MedicineOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.01Q12.65 0.11 up from 201847018%$2,760
10The Journal of Alternative and Complementary MedicineMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.00Q12.20 0.02 down from 201846740%—
0.96Q11.76 0.15 up from 2018199100%$1,800
12EXPLOREElsevier BV · United States
0.92Q11.44 0.27 up from 201820410%$2,090
0.87Q11.43 0.25 up from 2018137100%—
14Journal of pharmacopunctureOAKorean Pharmacopuncture Institute · South Korea
0.86Q11.92 0.56 up from 201889100%—
15Medical AcupunctureMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.80Q21.90 1.31 up from 201815394%—
16Journal of Dietary SupplementsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.74Q21.77 0.03 down from 20182334%—
17Holistic Nursing PracticeLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.66Q21.32 0.33 up from 20181554%—
18Complementary Medicine ResearchKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.58Q20.88 0.06 down from 201816941%—
0.53Q20.74 0.91 down from 201830100%—
20Chinese Journal of Integrative MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.50Q21.28 0.32 up from 20184663%$4,190
0.48Q21.30 0.20 up from 201836718%$2,430
0.47Q21.07 0.46 up from 201838——
23HomeopathyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.40Q22.01 1.05 up from 201817430%—
24Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.37Q20.73 0.05 down from 20181330%$4,090
0.36Q20.84 0.08 down from 20181022%$2,340
26Journal of Natural RemediesOAInformatics Publishing Limited · India
0.30Q20.67 0.18 up from 201856100%—
27Chinese MedicineOASpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.26Q20.60 0.52 up from 201835100%—
0.25Q30.40 0.27 down from 20183011%$4,150
0.23Q30.29 0.48 down from 201853100%—
30Integrative Medicine InternationalOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.23Q30.48 0.10 down from 201838——
0.22Q30.57 0.22 up from 2018125100%$1,400
0.22Q30.37 0.24 up from 2018111100%—
33Ancient Science of LifeOAMedknow · India
0.18Q30.13 0.36 down from 2018108——
34Medicina dello SportEdizioni Minerva Medica · Italy
0.15Q30.24 0.06 up from 20181122%—
0.13Q30.21 0.10 down from 2018133100%—
0.13Q30.21 0.30 down from 201847100%—
0.11Q3—no 2018 value44——
38Deutsche Zeitschrift für AkupunkturSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.11Q30.22 0.02 down from 201814917%$3,390
0.10Q30.10 0.24 down from 201863100%—
0.09Q30.17 0.08 down from 2018184100%—
0.09Q30.19 0.05 down from 201849100%—
0.08Q40.15 0.21 down from 201841100%—
42Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of Karachi · Pakistan
0.08Q40.00 0.30 down from 2018962100%—
0.08Q40.10 0.16 down from 20187421%—
45Alternative and Complementary TherapiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.07Q40.18 0.16 down from 201814611%—
46Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.07Q40.38 0.03 up from 20182222%$3,790
0.07Q40.19 0.15 down from 20183621%—
48Alternative & Integrative MedicineOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.04Q40.06 0.01 down from 201851610%—
0.03Q40.05 0.05 up from 20186189%—
50Nanfang huli xuebaoUniverse Scientific Publishing · China
0.02Q40.03 0.06 down from 2018490%—

Citations made in 2019. Corpus-wide, 83.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

23 additional Complementary and alternative medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2016–2018, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2019. Publication window: 2016–2018. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
54
Window papers (baseline)
40,222 -49.3% from indicator year 2016
Median OJR
0.25 -41.3% from indicator year 2016
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2016–2018 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314161721252726283134363739414243475454515051545958
Window papers (baseline)10,08112,57216,87821,62326,75331,70637,68443,89050,77157,28763,71270,34076,88082,13884,95484,74379,39267,38151,61840,22235,63838,28644,11253,44658,25563,352
Median OJR0.090.16230.3030.3020.170.2560.2420.210.16170.270.31590.310.3900.400.530.590.430.420.2630.250.2380.3910.4080.4070.31650.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.