OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

Complementary and alternative medicine journal rankings 2025

58 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine has 58 ranked journals in 2025. The median OJR rose 0.06 on 2024 to 0.37, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.89. No journal’s likely rank range stays within the top 3, so the intro names none.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

58
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.37+0.06 vs 2024
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

41%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,340
Median positive listed APC: $2,340 among 19 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 38 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

58 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Complementary and alternative medicine ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #4 of 58Acupuncture and Herbal MedicineOAWolters Kluwer · United States
1.89Q16.27 2.42 up from 2024120100%—
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #5 of 58Journal of Chinese Integrative MedicineElsevier BV · China
1.73Q15.09 1.02 up from 202417729%$1,800
Rank 3; likely between #1 and #8 of 58Integrative Medicine ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.65Q15.10 1.33 up from 2024143100%$1,700Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 4; likely between #2 and #5 of 58BMC Complementary Medicine and TherapiesOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.62Q14.83 0.77 up from 20241,159100%$2,195
Rank 5; likely between #3 and #13 of 58Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative MedicineOASAGE Publishing · United States
1.26Q14.03 0.60 down from 202453100%$2,000
Rank 6; likely between #5 and #11 of 58Complementary Therapies in MedicineOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.13Q14.30 0.36 up from 2024300100%$2,760Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 7; likely between #5 and #13 of 58Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.05Q13.93 0.04 down from 202429845%$3,530
Rank 8; likely between #1 and #29 of 58Future Integrative MedicinePublisher not listed
1.05Q13.02 2.43 up from 202463100%—
Rank 9; likely between #4 and #17 of 58Science of Traditional Chinese MedicineOAPublisher not listed
1.04Q13.00 2.39 up from 202455100%—
Rank 10; likely between #5 and #15 of 58Journal of Traditional and Complementary MedicineOAElsevier BV · Taiwan
1.01Q12.68no change241100%$0 listedFalling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 11; likely between #8 and #15 of 58Chinese Journal of Integrative MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.96Q13.08 0.36 up from 20243554%$4,190
Rank 12; likely between #6 and #17 of 58Holistic Nursing PracticeLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.94Q11.57 0.10 down from 202418915%—Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 13; likely between #7 and #16 of 58Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative MedicineOAElsevier BV · India
0.93Q12.42 0.21 down from 2024361100%$1,800
Rank 14; likely between #6 and #19 of 58Journal of Dietary SupplementsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.90Q13.31 0.73 up from 20249630%—
Rank 15; likely between #8 and #17 of 58EXPLOREElsevier BV · United States
0.89Q12.17 0.11 up from 202434724%$2,090
Rank 16; likely between #7 and #19 of 58Acupuncture in MedicineSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.88Q21.78 0.03 down from 20241358%$4,150
Rank 17; likely between #14 and #20 of 58Journal of Integrative and Complementary MedicineMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.74Q21.84 0.07 down from 202435924%—
Rank 18; likely between #12 and #24 of 58Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian StudiesElsevier BV · South Korea
0.70Q21.29 0.67 down from 202496——
Rank 19; likely between #13 and #25 of 58Journal of pharmacopunctureOAKorean Pharmacopuncture Institute · South Korea
0.66Q21.53 0.63 down from 2024119100%—
Rank 20; likely between #16 and #22 of 58World Journal of Traditional Chinese MedicineOAMedknow · India
0.66Q22.14 0.25 down from 2024160100%—
Rank 21; likely between #18 and #28 of 58Brain Behavior and Immunity IntegrativeOAElsevier BV
0.55Q21.83 0.59 down from 202497100%$2,570
Rank 22; likely between #19 and #27 of 58European Journal of Integrative MedicineElsevier BV · Germany
0.54Q21.54 0.53 down from 202429237%$2,430Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 23; likely between #19 and #29 of 58Complementary Medicine ResearchKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.51Q21.21 0.15 up from 202411534%—
Rank 24; likely between #17 and #31 of 58International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & PracticeOAMassage Therapy Foundation · Canada
0.49Q20.94 0.64 down from 202449100%—
Rank 25; likely between #21 and #29 of 58Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.47Q21.40 0.37 down from 202418525%$4,090Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 26; likely between #21 and #30 of 58Advances in Integrative MedicineElsevier BV
0.46Q21.18 0.46 down from 202413623%$2,340
Rank 27; likely between #20 and #30 of 58Digital Chinese MedicineOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.45Q21.29 0.01 up from 2024117100%$980
Rank 28; likely between #18 and #33 of 58International Journal of Ayurveda ResearchOAMedknow · India
0.44Q20.91 0.36 up from 202468100%—
Rank 29; likely between #23 and #30 of 58Medical AcupunctureMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.41Q20.78 0.17 down from 202416694%—
Rank 30; likely between #26 and #33 of 58HomeopathyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.34Q31.05 0.50 down from 202410911%—
Rank 31; likely between #28 and #35 of 58Chinese Medicine and CultureOALippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.27Q30.48 0.17 up from 202499100%—
Rank 32; likely between #30 and #36 of 58Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical SciencesOAElsevier BV · China
0.24Q30.85 0.06 up from 2024166100%$1,400
Rank 33; likely between #31 and #35 of 58Current Traditional MedicineNetherlands
0.23Q30.77 0.05 down from 202427776%—
Rank 34; likely between #30 and #39 of 58AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda)Medknow · India
0.22Q30.34 0.13 down from 202472100%—
Rank 35; likely between #31 and #40 of 58Journal of Clinical Exercise PhysiologyUnited States
0.19Q30.46 0.04 up from 2024800%—
Rank 36; likely between #34 and #38 of 58Journal of Natural RemediesOAInformatics Publishing Limited · India
0.17Q30.51 0.08 up from 2024451100%—
Rank 37; likely between #34 and #40 of 58Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.16Q30.64 0.07 up from 20241790%$3,790
Rank 38; likely between #35 and #49 of 58Infectious Diseases ResearchTMR publishing group · New Zealand
0.11Q30.34 0.06 down from 202462100%—
Rank 39; likely between #37 and #48 of 58Current Research in Complementary & Alternative MedicineOAUnited States
0.11Q30.27 0.33 down from 202473100%—
Rank 40; likely between #37 and #46 of 58Integrative and Complementary TherapiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.11Q30.26 0.06 down from 202413715%—
Rank 41; likely between #39 and #46 of 58Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of Karachi · Pakistan
0.09Q30.26 0.19 down from 2024540100%—
Rank 42; likely between #35 and #55 of 58Advanced Journal of NursingOASingapore
0.09Q30.14 0.09 down from 202441100%—
Rank 43; likely between #38 and #50 of 58American Journal of Traditional Chinese Veterinary MedicinePublisher not listed
0.09Q30.13 0.03 down from 20245948%—
Rank 44; likely between #38 and #53 of 58Revista Internacional de AcupunturaElsevier BV
0.09Q30.18 0.23 down from 202452—$1,870
Rank 45; likely between #37 and #54 of 58Social Medicine and Health ManagementPublisher not listed
0.08Q40.19 0.12 up from 202481100%—
Rank 46; likely between #40 and #51 of 58International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine ResearchUnited States
0.07Q40.15 0.03 down from 202428998%—
Rank 47; likely between #39 and #54 of 58Research in Health ScienceOAUnited States
0.06Q40.12 0.09 down from 202479100%—
Rank 48; likely between #37 and #57 of 58Clinical Research CommunicationsTMR publishing group · New Zealand
0.06Q40.23 0.06 down from 202477100%—
Rank 49; likely between #44 and #51 of 58Journal of Clinical and Nursing ResearchAustralia
0.06Q40.12 0.01 down from 202479147%—
Rank 50; likely between #42 and #55 of 58Chinese medicine and natural productsOAThieme Medical Publishers (Germany)
0.06Q40.21 0.01 down from 202467100%—

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Complementary and alternative medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
58
Window papers (baseline)
63,352 +43.6% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.37 -8.6% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314161721252726283134363739414243475454515051545958
Window papers (baseline)10,08112,57216,87821,62326,75331,70637,68443,89050,77157,28763,71270,34076,88082,13884,95484,74379,39267,38151,61840,22235,63838,28644,11253,44658,25563,352
Median OJR0.090.16230.3030.3020.170.2560.2420.210.16170.270.31590.310.3900.400.530.590.430.420.2630.250.2380.3910.4080.4070.31650.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.