OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2018

Complementary and alternative medicine journal rankings 2018

54 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine has 54 ranked journals in 2018. The median OJR fell 0.15 on 2017 to 0.26, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.86. The top three are Integrative Medicine International, Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, and BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

54
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.26-0.15 vs 2017
This subfieldAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

39%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,430
Median positive listed APC: $2,430 among 17 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 36 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

54 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Complementary and alternative medicine ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
1Integrative Medicine InternationalOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
12.41Q10.58 25.32 down from 201760100%—
1.94Q13.46 0.53 up from 2017232100%$0 listed
3BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.61Q13.20 0.36 up from 20171,497100%$2,990
1.30Q12.20 0.05 up from 20171857%$1,800
5The Journal of Alternative and Complementary MedicineMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.22Q12.22 0.09 up from 201742133%—
6Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.20Q12.37 0.21 down from 201724019%$3,530
7Integrative Medicine ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.20Q12.32 1.19 up from 2017137100%$1,700
8Holistic Nursing PracticeLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.19Q10.99 1.44 down from 20171597%—
9Complementary Therapies in MedicineOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.10Q12.54 0.17 down from 201737515%$2,760
1.09Q11.64 0.60 down from 2017217—$1,200
0.97Q11.61 0.14 up from 2017151100%$1,800
12HomeopathyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.94Q10.96 0.26 down from 201719016%—
13Journal of Dietary SupplementsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.89Q11.80 0.12 down from 20171687%—
14Acupuncture in MedicineSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.86Q11.90 0.18 down from 201722921%$4,150
0.79Q21.18 0.01 down from 2017139100%—
16EXPLOREElsevier BV · United States
0.78Q21.17 0.16 down from 201719820%$2,090
17Complementary Medicine ResearchKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.69Q20.94 0.17 down from 201717553%—
18Journal of pharmacopunctureOAKorean Pharmacopuncture Institute · South Korea
0.55Q21.36 0.24 up from 201793100%—
0.54Q20.77 0.20 down from 201756100%—
0.52Q21.10 0.22 up from 201735120%$2,430
21Chinese Journal of Integrative MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.45Q20.96 0.08 up from 20174911%$4,190
0.45Q20.92 0.04 up from 2017884%$2,340
23Medical AcupunctureMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.39Q20.59 0.04 up from 201717799%—
24Ancient Science of LifeOAMedknow · India
0.38Q20.49 0.01 down from 2017120100%—
25Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.34Q20.79 0.23 up from 20171155%$4,090
0.32Q20.51 0.16 up from 201737100%—
0.28Q20.13 0.63 down from 2017138100%—
0.25Q30.61 0.56 down from 201764——
0.22Q30.37 0.27 down from 201766100%—
30Journal of Natural RemediesOAInformatics Publishing Limited · India
0.22Q30.49 0.25 up from 201751100%—
0.21Q30.35 0.20 up from 20173214%—
32Nanfang huli xuebaoUniverse Scientific Publishing · China
0.20Q30.08 0.12 down from 2017670%—
0.18Q30.35 0.11 up from 2017111100%$1,400
34Alternative and Complementary TherapiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.16Q30.34 0.23 up from 20171536%—
35Deutsche Zeitschrift für AkupunkturSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.16Q30.24 0.01 down from 201713518%$3,390
36Chinese MedicineOASpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.16Q30.08 0.30 down from 201748100%—
37Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of Karachi · Pakistan
0.15Q30.30 0.16 down from 2017534100%—
0.15Q30.24 0.24 up from 201790100%—
0.14Q30.32 0.16 up from 201794100%—
0.13Q30.24 0.15 up from 201744100%—
0.12Q30.26no change645%—
42Medicina dello SportEdizioni Minerva Medica · Italy
0.12Q40.18 0.07 down from 2017421%—
0.11Q40.33 0.23 up from 20173120%—
0.09Q40.18 0.11 up from 201783——
45Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.09Q40.35no change2291%$3,790
46Alternative & Integrative MedicineOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.08Q40.07 0.05 down from 20173211%—
0.04Q40.15 0.12 up from 2017605%$1,870
48Journal of NursingOAUniverse Scientific Publishing · Singapore
0.03Q40.00 0.04 down from 201750100%—
0.03Q40.00no change48——
50Zhonghua zhongyiyao xuekanChinese Medical Association · China
0.02Q40.00 0.03 down from 201763——

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

24 additional Complementary and alternative medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
54
Window papers (baseline)
51,618 -39.1% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
0.263 -55.5% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314161721252726283134363739414243475454515051545958
Window papers (baseline)10,08112,57216,87821,62326,75331,70637,68443,89050,77157,28763,71270,34076,88082,13884,95484,74379,39267,38151,61840,22235,63838,28644,11253,44658,25563,352
Median OJR0.090.16230.3030.3020.170.2560.2420.210.16170.270.31590.310.3900.400.530.590.430.420.2630.250.2380.3910.4080.4070.31650.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.