OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2021

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2021

Complementary and alternative medicine journal rankings 2021

50 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Complementary and alternative medicine has 50 ranked journals in 2021. The median OJR rose 0.15 on 2020 to 0.39, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.82. The top three are BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, and Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2021. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2018–2020, the window the 2021 score is computed on.

50
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.39+0.15 vs 2020
This subfieldAll 0.79World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

42%
All fields: 36%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,340
Median positive listed APC: $2,340 among 19 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 30 have no known price. All fields: $3,290.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

50 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Complementary and alternative medicine ranking, 2021

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2020. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2018–2020, the window the 2021 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2018–2020 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2012 to 2021.

Compare
1BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.83Q15.74 1.00 up from 2020708—$2,990
1.69Q14.31 0.99 up from 2020189100%$0 listed
1.55Q14.89 1.25 up from 202019625%$1,800
4BMC Complementary Medicine and TherapiesOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.33Q13.60no 2020 value377100%$2,195
1.28Q14.12 1.55 up from 2020214100%$1,800
6Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative MedicineOASAGE Publishing · United States
1.26Q14.39 0.90 up from 202096100%$2,000
7Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.15Q14.50 0.84 up from 202045120%$3,530
8Integrative Medicine ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.14Q13.79 1.19 up from 2020217100%$1,700
9The Journal of Alternative and Complementary MedicineMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.04Q12.82 0.07 up from 202047933%—
10Complementary Therapies in MedicineOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.00Q14.11 0.87 up from 2020755100%$2,760
11Journal of Dietary SupplementsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.84Q12.73 0.28 up from 202017531%—
12Chinese Journal of Integrative MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.83Q13.19 1.38 up from 202038317%$4,190
13Journal of pharmacopunctureOAKorean Pharmacopuncture Institute · South Korea
0.82Q12.83 0.85 up from 202099100%—
0.82Q21.48 0.38 down from 20209397%—
15Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.80Q22.32 0.42 up from 202022412%$4,090
16EXPLOREElsevier BV · United States
0.70Q21.71 1.07 down from 202028927%$2,090
17Acupuncture in MedicineSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.67Q21.82 0.24 down from 202023011%$4,150
0.62Q22.28 0.61 up from 202040418%$2,430
19HomeopathyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.59Q21.99 0.06 down from 202012124%—
0.57Q22.12 1.35 up from 202012515%$2,340
21Medical AcupunctureMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.53Q21.04 0.20 down from 202019592%—
22Holistic Nursing PracticeLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.52Q21.15 0.13 down from 202015416%—
23Complementary Medicine ResearchKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.51Q21.40 0.24 up from 202016337%—
0.51Q20.89 2.36 down from 202050100%—
0.42Q20.51 0.30 down from 2020115100%—
0.36Q31.32 0.69 up from 2020110100%—
27Digital Chinese MedicineOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.34Q30.96 0.25 up from 202079100%$980
0.24Q30.98 0.37 up from 2020135100%$1,400
0.22Q30.51 0.01 up from 202015010%—
30Medicina dello SportEdizioni Minerva Medica · Italy
0.21Q31.00 0.66 up from 20207510%—
0.18Q30.42 0.29 up from 202082100%—
0.17Q30.45 0.04 down from 20206626%—
33Journal of Natural RemediesOAInformatics Publishing Limited · India
0.17Q30.19 0.42 down from 2020214100%—
34Chinese Medicine and CultureOALippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.15Q30.09 0.09 down from 202047100%—
0.11Q30.15 0.07 down from 2020159100%—
0.11Q30.33 0.08 up from 202072100%—
37Traditional Medicine and Modern MedicineOAWorld Scientific · United States
0.11Q30.27 0.12 down from 202075100%—
38Alternative and Complementary TherapiesMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.09Q30.31 0.06 up from 20201416%—
39Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.08Q40.36 0.11 up from 20202040%$3,790
0.07Q40.24 0.24 up from 20205893%—
0.06Q40.17 0.03 up from 202038100%—
0.06Q40.19 0.09 up from 202073100%—
43Deutsche Zeitschrift für AkupunkturSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.04Q40.07no change15124%$3,390
0.03Q40.23 0.15 up from 20206215%$1,870
0.03Q41.00 0.82 up from 202039——
46Clinical Research CommunicationsTMR publishing group · New Zealand
0.02Q40.07 0.07 up from 202051100%—
0.01Q40.03 0.02 down from 202019095%—
48Alternative & Integrative MedicineOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.01Q40.10 0.08 up from 20202530%—
0.01Q40.03 0.03 up from 202073100%—
50Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOAUniversity of Karachi · Pakistan
0.01Q40.04 0.04 up from 20201,199100%—

Citations made in 2021. Corpus-wide, 87.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

24 additional Complementary and alternative medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2018–2020, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2021. Publication window: 2018–2020. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
50
Window papers (baseline)
38,286 -25.8% from indicator year 2018
Median OJR
0.391 +48.5% from indicator year 2018
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2018–2020 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314161721252726283134363739414243475454515051545958
Window papers (baseline)10,08112,57216,87821,62326,75331,70637,68443,89050,77157,28763,71270,34076,88082,13884,95484,74379,39267,38151,61840,22235,63838,28644,11253,44658,25563,352
Median OJR0.090.16230.3030.3020.170.2560.2420.210.16170.270.31590.310.3900.400.530.590.430.420.2630.250.2380.3910.4080.4070.31650.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.